Arkansas Val. Royalty Co. v. Arkansas-Oklahoma Gas Co.
Decision Date | 25 May 1953 |
Docket Number | No. 5-101,ARKANSAS-OKLAHOMA,5-101 |
Citation | 222 Ark. 213,258 S.W.2d 51 |
Parties | ARKANSAS VALLEY ROYALTY CO. v.GAS CO. et al. |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Lee Seamster, Don Trumbo and E. J. Ball, all of Fayetteville, for appellant.
Daily & Woods, Ft. Smith, Moore, Burrow, Chowning & Mitchell, Little Rock, for appellees.
The principal issue is whether a certain instrument conveys a one-eighth royalty to an undivided interest in the oil, gas, and other minerals that may be produced from the described property; or is it a deed to the fee in an undivided interest in such minerals. The Chancellor held it to be a conveyance of a one-eighth royalty. We agree with the Chancellor.
At the time of his death in the latter part of August, 1927, J. A. Kelley owned and occupied as a homestead 120 acres on which was outstanding an oil and gas lease in favor of the Southern Union Gas Company. Kelley died intestate, survived by a widow and seven sons and daughters. On March 26, 1931, the widow Mary E. Kelley, two of the daughters with their husbands, and one son with his wife executed and delivered to the Arkansas Valley Royalty Company, a corporation, an instrument prepared by H. H. Ball on a printed form entitled 'Mineral Deed'. The blank spaces in the form were filled in with pen and ink by Mr. Ball, president of the grantee corporation. That part of the deed which is in Ball's handwriting is indicated by italics; the pertinent part of the conveyance is as follows:
The lease held by Southern Union Gas Company, referred to in the Arkansas Valley Royalty Company instrument, was cancelled and forfeited and no well was ever drilled pursuant to that lease.
On October 5, 1943, all seven of the children of J. A. Kelley and Mary E. Kelley, his widow, executed an Oil and Gas Lease to Arkansas-Oklahoma Gas Company, and on the 29th day of December, 1949, that company conveyed to Arkansas-Louisiana Gas Company an undivided 1/2 interest in the lease. Land covered by the lease is in the Cecil Gas Field in Franklin County. Gas has been discovered in...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Stokes v. Tutvet, 9594
...supra, 144 Tex. 179, 189 S.W.2d 699; Pure Oil Co. v. Kindall, 116 Ohio St. 188, 156 N.E. 119; Arkansas Valley Royalty Co. v. Arkansas-Oklahoma Gas Co., 222 Ark. 213, 258 S.W.2d 51. Oklahoma adheres to the rule that the use of the word 'royalty' without more, in a conveyance before a lease o......
-
Atlantic Refining Co. v. Beach
...the interest transferred to be royalty, despite the grant or reservation of express easements. Arkansas Valley Royalty Co. v. Arkansas-Oklahoma Gas Co., 222 Ark. 213, 258 S.W.2d 51; Colonial Royalties Co. v. Keener, 266 P.2d 467 The intention clause of the deed before us commences: 'This co......
-
Keith v. City of Cave Springs
...the settled rule that a contract is construed most strongly against the party who prepares it, Arkansas Valley Royalty Co. v. Arkansas-Oklahoma Gas Co., 222 Ark. 213, 258 S.W.2d 51, the Chancery Court, in its opinion, made finding that the terms of the contract between E. L. Keith and the C......
-
United States v. RD Wilmans & Sons, Inc.
...51, 54, 204 P.2d 900; Bodcaw Oil Co. v. Atlantic Refining Co., 217 Ark. 50, 228 S.W.2d 626; and Arkansas Valley Royalty Co. v. Arkansas-Oklahoma Gas Company, 222 Ark. 213, 258 S.W.2d 51. As a matter of fact, it may be stated without elaboration that if the granting clause as a whole, includ......
-
CHAPTER 1 ROYALTY INTERESTS IN THE UNITED STATES: NOT CUT FROM THE SAME CLOTH
...v. Cox, 138 Colo. 324, 333 P.2d 619, 10 O.&G.R. 906 (1958). [15] See e.g., Arkansas Valley Royalty Co. v. Arkansas-Oklahoma Gas Co., 222 Ark. 213, 258 S.W.2d 51 2 O.&G.R. 877 (1953); Texas Gulf Producing Co. v. Griffith, 218 Miss. 109, 65 So. 2d 447, 834, 2 O.&G.R. 1278 (1953); Rist v. Tool......