Armour Bros. Banking Co. v. Smith

Decision Date13 December 1892
Citation20 S.W. 690,113 Mo. 12
PartiesARMOUR BROS. BANKING CO. v. SMITH et al., (CAIRNS, Intervener.)
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from St. Louis circuit court, L. B. VALLIANT, Judge.

Action by the Armour Bros. Banking Company against Charles R. Smith and the St. Louis National Bank as garnishee, with L. G. Cairns, the claimant of the property attached, interpleaded. From a judgment sustaining the interpleader, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

Horatio D. Wood, for appellant. Fisse & Allen and P. Taylor Bryan, for respondents.

THOMAS, J.

On the 23d of October, 1887, the plaintiff company commenced an action of attachment against Charles R. Smith, a nonresident of this state, upon two promissory notes, amounting to over $41,000. A writ of attachment was issued, and on the same day the sheriff summoned the St. Louis National Bank, as garnishee, which, in its answer to interrogations, stated that it had in its custody three certificates of stock, numbered 151, 152, and 153, issued to Charles R. Smith by the Colorado, Chicago & Texas Land, Cattle & Improvement Company, a corporation organized under the laws of Texas, the certificates being for 500 shares of stock in the aggregate of the par value of $100 each; that these certificates had been deposited with the garnishee as collateral security for a note signed by Smith, payable to J. J. Fisher, for $7,000, and by the latter indorsed to the bank; that on December 2, 1889, L. G. Cairns, by his agent, paid said note of $7,000, but at the same time notified said bank that the amount of the note was tendered and paid by Cairns as the owner of the shares of said stock, and not for the benefit or for account of said Smith; and the garnishee prayed that Cairns be permitted to interplead in the cause, and asked leave of the court to deposit the said certificates of stock with the clerk, to be held and disposed of in pursuance of the order of the court. The certificates were thus deposited, the garnishee discharged, and an order made on Cairns to appear and sustain his claim. Smith made default, but Cairns appeared, and filed a plea to the jurisdiction of the court, as also a motion to quash the return of the sheriff on the writ of attachment, on the ground, among others, that the said certificates of stock were not subject to the process of garnishment. The plea and motion were both sustained, the garnishment proceeding dismissed, and plaintiff has appealed.

1. It is a well-settled principle of law that stock in a corporation cannot be attached or subjected to a garnishee process unless authorized by express statute. Drake, Attachm. § 244; Foster v. Potter, 37 Mo. 526; Plimpton v. Bigelow, 93 N. Y. 593. And the question presented by this record for decision involves the construction of the several sections of our statute on the subject of the seizure and sale of shares of stock in a corporation under execution and attachment. Section 540, Rev. St. 1889, provides that "shares of stock in any bank, association, joint-stock company, or corporation, belonging to any defendant in any writ of attachment, may be attached in the same manner as the same may be levied upon under execution." Turning to the statute in regard to executions we find that sections 4915, 4924, 4925, and 4953 in substance provide that shares of stock in corporations may be sold under execution; that, when an execution is issued against a person owning shares of stock in any corporation, it shall be the duty of the secretary or other officer to furnish to the sheriff a certificate of the number of shares held by the defendant, with the incumbrance thereon; that the levy shall be made by leaving a copy of the writ with the secretary or other officer, with a certificate, attested by the officer, that he levies upon and takes such shares to satisfy the execution; and that, when such shares are sold, the officer shall execute and deliver to the purchaser a bill of sale conveying the same, and leave with the secretary of the corporation a copy of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
31 cases
  • State ex rel. N. American Co. v. Koerner
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 12 Abril 1948
    ... ... Foster v. Potter, 37 Mo. 525; Armour Bros. Banking Co. v. St. Louis Natl. Bank, 113 Mo. 12; Tufts v. Volkening, ... v. Rutledge, 321 Mo. 1090, 13 S.W. (2d) 1061; State ex rel. v. Smith, 345 Mo. 1158, 139 S.W. (2d) 929. (13) The court will interpret and apply ... ...
  • Lohman v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 25 Noviembre 1930
    ... ... Smith for respondent; S. W. Moore of counsel ...          (1) The ... Carpenter, 235 ... Fed. (C. C. A. 8 Circ.) 273; Black v. Foreman Bros., ... 218 Fed. (D. C. Ill.) 266; Klein v. Wilson, 7 F.2d ... 769; 2 ... 183; Troll v ... Third Natl. Bank, 278 Mo. 74; Armour, etc. Co. v ... Nat. Bank, 113 Mo. 12; Dean, etc. Co. v ... Howell, ...          In the ... first Troll case (278 Mo.), the banking corporation had its ... domicile in Missouri and the certificate of stock ... ...
  • Hayes v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 16 Septiembre 1927
    ... ... remaining after the payment of its debts. Armour Bros ... Banking Co. v. National Bank, 113 Mo. 12; Eisner v ... Wallace, 90 ... S.C. 61 Soehnlein Soehnlein, 146 Wis 330 Smith's Estate, ... 140 Pa. 344, In re Osborne, 209 N.Y. 450; In re ... ...
  • State ex rel. North American Co. v. Koerner
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 12 Abril 1948
    ... ... Foster v ... Potter, 37 Mo. 525; Armour Bros. Banking Co. v. St ... Louis Natl. Bank, 113 Mo. 12; Tufts v ... v. Rutledge, 321 Mo. 1090, 13 S.W.2d ... 1061; State ex rel. v. Smith, 345 Mo. 1158, 139 ... S.W.2d 929. (13) The court will interpret and ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT