Arthaud v. Griffin
Decision Date | 26 October 1926 |
Docket Number | 37599 |
Citation | 210 N.W. 540,202 Iowa 462 |
Parties | F. L. ARTHAUD, Appellant, v. C. J. GRIFFIN, Appellee |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
Appeal from Warren District Court.--W. S. COOPER, Judge.
Appeal from an order overruling motion to reinstate a cause which had been dismissed for failure to file a written appointment of a resident attorney to defend suit.--Reversed and remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
F. L Arthaud and W. M. Wilson, for appellant.
A. V Proudfoot, for appellee.
FAVILLE J. DE GRAFF, C. J., and STEVENS and VERMILION, JJ., concur.
The facts in this case appear without dispute. Appellant is an attorney, regularly engaged in practice as such, in the state of Missouri. W. M. Wilson is an attorney resident at Indianola, in this state, and duly admitted to the practice of law. Wilson had been previously associated with appellant in conducting a certain lawsuit in the district court of Warren County, Iowa. On the 8th day of August, 1925, Wilson filed in the office of the clerk of the district court of Warren County, Iowa, the petition in this cause, and at the same time delivered a copy of the petition to the attorney for the appellee. By inadvertence, Wilson failed to sign the petition as attorney for the plaintiff, but was, as a matter of fact, acting as attorney for the plaintiff. On or about the 20th day of August, 1925, Wilson entered his appearance as attorney for the plaintiff upon the appearance docket where said cause was filed, and also upon the judge's calendar. On September 1, 1925, the appellee, by his attorney, filed a motion to strike the petition in the above entitled cause, supporting same by an affidavit. In said motion and affidavit it is recited that the appellant herein appears as attorney for the plaintiff (himself) in said cause, and is a practicing attorney in the state of Missouri, and a resident of said state, and that he has not filed with the clerk of the district court of Warren County, Iowa, the written appointment of a resident attorney in the county of Warren and state of Iowa, where said petition is pending, as provided by Section 10919 of the Code of 1924. The court sustained said motion, and ordered the petition stricken from the record.
Thereafter, on the 15th day of September, 1925, the appellant filed a motion to reinstate said cause. Said motion recites the facts hereinbefore referred to, and alleges that Wilson inadvertently failed to sign the petition, at the time of filing the same, and that the omission was merely a clerical error on his part. It is also admitted in the record that Wilson had no written appointment as attorney for the plaintiff, except by correspondence, and that no written appointment under the statute was filed. Upon the statement of facts submitted with the motion, the trial court overruled the motion to reinstate the petition. From this ruling this appeal is taken.
Section 10919 of the Code of 1924 is as follows:
The purpose of said section was to require lawyers from foreign states who practice before the courts of this state to appoint of record a local ...
To continue reading
Request your trial