Arzola v. Reigosa
| Decision Date | 06 December 1988 |
| Docket Number | No. 88-1637,88-1637 |
| Citation | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2639,534 So.2d 883 |
| Parties | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2639 Leonardo ARZOLA, Petitioner, v. Lucia REIGOSA and Elena Barrios Reigosa, Respondents. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Neil Carver, Coral Gables, for petitioner.
Blackwell, Walker, Fascell & Hoehl and Kathleen M. Salyer, Miami, for respondents.
Before HUBBART, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.
The petition for a writ of certiorari seeking review of a trial court order which directs the pretrial discovery of medical records concerning the plaintiff's post-accident psychiatric treatment is denied. The plaintiff brought the instant negligence action arising out of an automobile/bicycle collision below and, inter alia, sought mental anguish damages. This being so, he cannot claim, as urged, a psychotherapist-patient privilege with respect to these records; there is no such privilege "[f]or communications relevant to an issue of the mental or emotional condition of the patient in any proceeding in which he relies upon the condition as an element of his claim...." § 90.503(4)(c), Fla.Stat. (1987). Contrary to plaintiff's argument, we conclude that plaintiff has made his post-accident mental or emotional condition an element of his negligence claim below by requesting post-accident mental anguish damages; we reach this result based on the indistinguishable authority of Yoho v. Lindsley, 248 So.2d 187 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971), and Haney v. Mizell Memorial Hospital, 744 F.2d 1467 (11th Cir.1984) (applying Florida law).
CERTIORARI DENIED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Nelson v. Womble, 95-964
...or emotional condition an element of his negligence claim" and cannot invoke the psychotherapist-patient privilege. Arzola v. Reigosa, 534 So.2d 883 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). The respondent is not entitled to invoke the psychotherapist-patient privilege because she has placed her mental condition......
-
F.M. v. Old Cutler Presbyterian Church, Inc., 92-132
...and has waived her rights to confidentiality concerning her mental condition as it relates to the litigation. See Arzola v. Reigosa, 534 So.2d 883 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Yoho v. Lindsley, 248 So.2d 187 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971). However, even though the Church is entitled to discovery concerning A.M......
-
Weinstock v. Groth, 95-1173
...allegations that parent is mentally unstable is not sufficient to overcome psychotherapist-patient privilege). Compare Arzola v. Reigosa, 534 So.2d 883 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) (order directing production of post-accident psychiatric treatment records proper since plaintiff sought damages for men......
-
Scheff v. Mayo
...or emotional condition an element of his negligence claim" and cannot invoke the psychotherapist-patient privilege. Arzola v. Reigosa, 534 So.2d 883 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). The respondent is not entitled to invoke the psychotherapist-patient privilege because she has placed her mental condition......