Ashford v. H. C. Schrader Co
Decision Date | 14 October 1914 |
Docket Number | (No. 161.) |
Citation | 83 S.E. 29,167 N.C. 45 |
Parties | ASHFORD et al. v. H. C. SCHRADER CO. |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Appeal from Superior Court, Craven County; Daniels, Judge.
Action by T. P. Ashford and another against the H. C. Schrader Company. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
This is an action to recover damages for an alleged breach of an implied warranty in the sale of 600 boxes of oranges. Both the plaintiff and the defendant are dealers in oranges, plaintiff doing business at Newbern and the defendant in Florida. The contract was to sell 600 boxes of oranges at a price agreed on, without further description, and the right was given to the plaintiff, who was the purchaser of the oranges, to inspect. The oranges were shipped to Newbern to the order of the defendant, with draft upon plaintiff and bill of lading attached. There was evidence offered upon the part of the plaintiff that he exercised ordinary care in the inspection of the oranges, and did not discover any defect therein, and that he then paid the purchase price, and it was afterwards discovered that one-third of the oranges were rotten and unfit for sale. His honor charged the jury, among other tilings, as follows:
The defendant excepted to that part of the charge holding that there was an implied warranty that the oranges should be salable, and also to the part of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Swift & Co v. Aydlett
...L. R. A. (N. S.) 245, 119 Am. St. Rep. 956; Dr. Shoop Family Medicine Co. v. Davenport, 163 N. C. 294, 79 S. E. 602; Ashford v. Shrader, 167 N. C. 45, 83 S. E. 29. It is immaterial that defendant vendee, gave to plaintiff, vendor, a note, in form negotiable, for the purchase price of the go......
-
Swift & Co. v. Aydlett
... ... 943, 11 L. R. A. (N. S.) 245, 119 Am. St ... Rep. 956; Dr. Shoop Family Medicine Co. v ... Davenport, 163 N.C. 294, 79 S.E. 602; Ashford v ... Shrader, 167 N.C. 45, 83 S.E. 29 ... It is ... immaterial that defendant, vendee, gave to plaintiff, vendor, ... a ... ...
-
Perfecting Service Co. v. Product Development & Sales Co., 251
... ... Aldridge Motors, Inc. v. Alexander, 217 N.C. 750, 9 S.E.2d 469; Ashford v. H. C. Shrader Co., 167 N.C. 45, 83 S.E. 29. 'Where goods are sold with a warranty and the vendee resells with a similar warranty, which is ... ...
- Hampton Guano Co v. Hill Live Stock Co