Ashurst v. Ashurst
Decision Date | 11 February 1913 |
Parties | ASHURST et al. v. ASHURST. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Appeal from Chancery Court, Tallapoosa County; W.W. Whiteside Chancellor.
Bill by Gillie D. Ashurst against Harry G. Ashurst and others for removal of an estate from the probate to the chancery court to construe a will and for instructions to the executor. Decree for complainant, and respondents appeal. Affirmed.
See also, 57 South, 442.
The will of J.V. Ashurst, executed January 3, 1903, is as follows:
James W. Strother, of Dadeville, for appellants.
W.F. Thetford and Stuart Mackenzie, both of Montgomery, for appellee.
DE GRAFFENRIED, J.
The reporter will set out, in his statement of the facts of this case, items 1, 3, and 8 of the will, which, in this case, we are called upon to construe.
1. Section 1030 of the Code of 1896, which controls the provisions of this will, is as follows: "Lands may be conveyed to the wife and children or children only severally, successively and jointly; and to...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Powell v. Pearson
... ... 73, 97 So. 353; Pearce v ... Pearce, 199 Ala. 491, 74 So. 952; Montgomery v ... Wilson, 189 Ala. 209, 66 So. 503; Ashurst v ... Ashurst, 181 Ala. 401, 61 So. 942. The foregoing ... authorities touch the rights of grandchildren and others ... under the last class or ... ...
-
Reid v. Armistead
... ... and the affirmance thereof, the will was not construed on ... first appeal. Carroll v. Richardson, 87 Ala. 605, 6 ... So. 342; Ashurst et al. v. Ashurst, 175 Ala. 667, 57 ... So. 442; Powell et al. v. Labry et al., 207 Ala ... 117, 92 So. 266; Schowalter et al. v. Schowalter, ... ...
-
Henderson v. Henderson
... ... bequest was invalid as to ... the period beyond the attainment of the minor of his ... majority. The reference to section 3410 in Ashurst v ... Ashurst, 181 Ala. 401, 407, 61 So. 942, 943, was merely ... in the nature of a ... [97 So. 362] ... quære; there was express ... ...
-
Crawford v. Carlisle
...28 L.Ed. 1015, 1027, 1028; 21 R.C.L. 293 [15]; Pearce v. Pearce, supra; Lyons v. Bradley, supra, 168 Ala. 512, 53 So. 244; Ashurst v. Ashurst, 181 Ala. 401, 61 So. 942; M.A.L. § 243). The interesting observation is made that the suit of Bengough v. Edridge, 1 Sim. 173, better known to stude......