Atchison Homeless Shelters, Inc. v. County of Atchison, 77599
| Decision Date | 10 October 1997 |
| Docket Number | No. 77599,77599 |
| Citation | 946 P.2d 113,24 Kan.App.2d 454 |
| Parties | ATCHISON HOMELESS SHELTERS, INC., Appellant, v. The COUNTY OF ATCHISON, Kansas, Appellee. |
| Court | Kansas Court of Appeals |
Syllabus by the Court
1. Only four categories of individuals may appear in the courts of this state (except for out-of-state attorneys): (1) members of the bar; (2) graduates of accredited law schools who have temporary permits to practice law; (3) legal interns, who are law students supervised by members of the bar responsible for the interns' activities; and (4) nonlawyers, who may represent only themselves and not others in court.
2. Kansas follows the common-law rule that an appearance in court of a corporation by an agent other than a licensed attorney is not proper since a corporation is an artificial entity without the right of self-representation.
Rev. Don Lockhart, Patricia A. Lockhart, and LaChelle Lockart, pro se, for appellant.
Leonard L. Buddenbohm, Atchison, for appellee.
Before KNUDSON, P.J., and STEPHEN D. HILL and PAUL E. MILLER, District Judges, Assigned.
Atchison Homeless Shelters, Inc., is a corporation which has filed this appeal from an order awarding sanctions against it for filing a frivolous claim in the district court of Atchison County. No attorney has entered an appearance for the appellants in this appeal.
Except for out-of-state attorneys, the Supreme Court recognizes only four categories of individuals who may appear in the courts of this state: (1) members of the bar who have licenses to practice law; (2) individuals who have graduated from an accredited law school and have a temporary permit to practice law; (3) legal interns, who are law students supervised by members of the bar responsible for the interns' activities; and (4) nonlawyers, who may represent only themselves and not others. State ex rel. Stephan v. Adam, 243 Kan. 619, 623, 760 P.2d 683 (1988); see State ex rel. Stephan v. Williams, 246 Kan. 681, 690-91, 793 P.2d 234 (1990).
This means, therefore, that corporations can only be represented in Kansas courts by an attorney duly licensed to practice law in Kansas. Kansas follows the common-law rule that an appearance in court of a corporation by an agent other than a licensed attorney is not proper since a corporation is an artificial entity without the right of self-representation. Such a rule helps to maintain a distinction between the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Schaake v. City of Lawrence
...counsel. See State ex rel. Stephan v. O'Keefe , 235 Kan. 1022, 1033, 686 P.2d 171 (1984) ; Atchison Homeless Shelters, Inc. v. Atchison County , 24 Kan. App. 2d 454, 454-55, 946 P.2d 113 (1997) ; Hickman v. Frerking , 4 Kan. App. 2d 590, 592, 609 P.2d 682 (1980). There is good reason for th......
-
Babe Houser Motor Co. v. Tetreault, No. 85,012.
...by or appeared through a duly licensed Kansas attorney. In so holding, the court stated it relied on Atchison Homeless Shelters, Inc. v. Atchison County, 24 Kan. App.2d 454, 946 P.2d 113,rev.denied 263 Kan. 885 Houser appealed. The district court affirmed, concluding that since Houser was a......
-
In re Arnold
...rule in Kansas that a corporation may not appear in court by an agent who is not an attorney. Atchison Homeless Shelters, Inc. v. Atchison County, 24 Kan. App. 2d 454, 455, 946 P.2d 113, rev. denied 263 Kan. 885 (1997). Although we recently modified this rule with respect to matters under t......
-
Carpenters Dist. Coun. of Kan. v. James Interiors, CIV.A.03-221-CM.
...proper since a corporation is an artificial entity without the right of self-representation." Atchison Homeless Shelters, Inc., v. County of Atchison, 24 Kan.App.2d 454, 455, 946 P.2d 113 (1997). However, this rule may be abrogated or modified by statute. Babe Houser Motor Co. v. Tetreault,......
-
Artificial People: Why Corporations Cannot Appear in Court Without a Lawyer
...Kan. 340, 347-48 (1870). The Court of Appeals more recently applied this rule in Atchison Homeless Shelters Inc., 24 Kan. App. 2d at 455, 946 P.2d 113. There, a corporation sought to appeal an order of the district court without the assistance of an attorney. The Court of Appeals dismissed ......
-
Artificial People: Why Corporations Cannot Appear in Court Without a Lawyer
...5 Kan. 340, 347-48 (1870). The Court of Appeals more recently applied this rule in Atchison Homeless Shelters Inc., 24 Kan.App.2d at 455, 946 P.2d 113- There, a corporation sought to appeal an order of the district court without the assistance of an attorney. The Court of Appeals dismissed ......
-
1999 Legislative Wrap Up
...were allowed to appear by a representative. Some judges had interpreted Atchison Homeless Shelters Inc. v. County of Atchison, 24 Kan.App.2d 454, 946 P.2d 113 (1997), to prohibit corporations from appearing without an attorney duly licensed to practice law in Kansas. Indeed, the Kansas Bar ......