Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Word
Decision Date | 03 May 1913 |
Citation | 159 S.W. 375 |
Parties | ATCHISON, T. & S. F. RY. CO. et al. v. WORD. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Potter County; J. N. Browning, Judge.
Action by C. T. Word against the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railway Company and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants, except the Ft. Worth & Denver City Railway Company, appeal. Affirmed.
Madden, Trulove & Kimbrough and F. M. Ryburn, all of Amarillo, Terry, Cavin & Mills, of Galveston, and T. B. McCormick, of Dallas, for appellants. W. Boyce and Turner & Wharton, all of Amarillo, for appellee.
The appellee, C. T. Word, sued the Ft. Worth & Denver City Railway Company, together with the appellants, the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railway Company, the Southern Kansas Railway Company of Texas, and the Missouri Pacific Railway Company, for damages to three shipments of cattle. On April 16, 1910, C. T. Word delivered to the Ft. Worth & Denver City Railway Company, at Simmons, Tex., for shipment to Summit, Kan., 1,971 head of cattle to be transported over the lines of the above-named companies. These were shipped in two trains; the first shipment consisting of 35 cars and the second shipment containing 27 cars. On the 30th day of April, 1910, appellee delivered to the Ft. Worth & Denver City Railway Company, at Simmons, Tex., for transportation, 67 head of cattle, two cars, over the lines of the Ft. Worth & Denver City Railway Company and the appellants in this case to Summit, Kan. Unreasonable delay en route, rough handling, etc., is alleged, and consequent injury to the cattle and damage therefrom.
The Ft. Worth & Denver City Railway Company answered by general and special plea, and among other things pleaded the terms of the shipping contract, limiting its liability to loss or injury occurring on its own line of road. The Atchison, Topeka & Sante Fé Railway Company and the Southern Kansas Railway Company of Texas answered jointly, generally, and specially, and the Missouri Pacific Railway Company also answered generally and specially. The respective pleas of the parties will be stated more in detail in discussing the several assignments. Judgment based upon the verdict of the jury trying the cause was rendered for appellee Word against the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railway Company for $1,329, against the Southern Kansas Railway Company of Texas for $771.45, and the Missouri Pacific Railway Company for $2,185.60; no damages were assessed against the Ft. Worth & Denver City Railway Company. The case appears to have been tried in the court below upon the theory that it was governed alone by the statutes and decisions of this state and the briefs of the respective parties so treat the case, but by supplemental citation of authorities counsel for the Santa Fé roads call attention to the fact that this case is controlled by the interstate commerce act.
The first, second, third, fourth, fifth, and sixth assignments relate to pleadings and contracts of shipment of the two roads, the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé and the Southern Kansas Railway Company of Texas, designated by us for brevity as the Santa Fé, setting up and pleading certain clauses of the shipping contract with reference to notice of claims for damages as a condition precedent to the right of recovery. The contracts so set up are those executed by the Santa Fé. The fourth paragraph (a, b, and c) of the Santa Fé's answer is as follows:
The appellee, Word, replied to said answer as follows:
The contracts entered into by the appellee with the Ft. Worth & Denver City Railway Company were all of the same form and were alike, except as to dates, numbers of cars, cattle, etc., and in part are as follows:
"Live Stock Contract.
—giving the number of cars, initials, number of cattle, etc. It is further provided in case the cattle were to be transported over the roads of any other railway company that the carrier should be released from liability of every kind after said stock shall have left its road, and that its liability should be limited to its own line of railway. This is substantially all of the Denver Railway Company's contract, as set out in the record.
The contract set up by the Santa Fé occupies some 17 pages of the record, but the clause set out and upon which stress is laid by said Santa Fé is No. 8, and is as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Erisman v. Chi., B. & Q. R. Co.
...Carl, 227 U. S. 639, 33 Sup. Ct. 391, 57 L. Ed. 683;S. L. S. W. Ry. Co. v. Ray (Tex. Civ. App.) 127 S. W. 281;Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. Word (Tex. Civ. App.) 159 S. W. 375;Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Ward (Tex. Civ. App.) 169 S. W. 1035. [6] The only effect of the Carmack Amendment, a......
-
Erisman v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co.
... ... & H. Co ... v. Atlantic C. L. R. Co. , (S. C.) 83 S.E. 599; St ... Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. Mounts , (Okla.) 144 P. 1036; ... Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. Boyce , (Tex.) 171 ... S.W. 1094; Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Harrington ... (Okla.) 143 P. 325; Glassman v. Chicago, ... 639 (33 S.Ct. 391, 57 L.Ed. 683); St ... Louis S.W. R. Co. of Texas v. Ray , 127 S.W. 281; ... Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. Word , (Tex.) 159 S.W ... 375; Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. Ward , (Tex.) 169 ... S.W. 1035 ... The ... only effect of the Carmack ... ...
-
Burd v. San Antonio Southern Ry. Co.
...by Chief Justice Huff, ruled that plaintiff "may sue the initial carrier, together with the connecting carriers." Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Word, 159 S. W. 375. The Supreme Court refused a writ of error in that case. Justice Hodges expressed the opinion that the initial carrier could ......
-
Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. Buck
...no defense, when there has been a failure to give such notice. Railway Co. v. Grain Co., 103 Tex. 542, 131 S. W. 410; Railway Co. v. Word, 159 S. W. 375; Railway Co. v. Montgomery, 141 S. W. 813; Railway Co. v. Brooks, 145 S. W. 649; Railway Co. v. Dunford, 152 S. W. 1129; Railway Co. v. Dr......