Atkin v. Union Processing Corp.

Decision Date28 June 1983
Citation59 N.Y.2d 919,453 N.E.2d 522,466 N.Y.S.2d 293
Parties, 453 N.E.2d 522, 1984-1 Trade Cases P 65,821 Morris ATKIN et al., Respondents, v. UNION PROCESSING CORPORATION, Appellant, et al., Defendants. (And Another Action.)
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
OPINION OF THE COURT MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Justice Reid S. Moule (90 A.D.2d 332, 457 N.Y.S.2d 152). Additionally we observe that there is no evidentiary support in the record for any finding that the scrap metals/raw materials market (as distinguished from the shredded scrap/products market) was limited to the Rochester area to which the agreement of the parties related.

COOKE, C.J., and JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER and MEYER, JJ., concur.

SIMONS, J., taking no part.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Abrams
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • February 11, 1988
    ...356 U.S. 1, 5, 78 S.Ct. 514, 518, 2 L.Ed.2d 545; Atkin v. Union Processing Corp., 90 A.D.2d 332, 457 N.Y.S.2d 152, affd. 59 N.Y.2d 919, 466 N.Y.S.2d 293, 453 N.E.2d 522, cert. denied 465 U.S. 1038, 104 S.Ct. 1316, 79 L.Ed.2d 712). Even in light of this general judicial gloss, however, the s......
  • People v. Rattenni
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • January 13, 1992
    ...into between the parties here is illegal per se. Atkin v. Union Processing Corp., 90 A.D.2d 332, 457 N.Y.S.2d 152, affd. 59 N.Y.2d 919, 466 N.Y.S.2d 293, 453 N.E.2d 522, cert. denied 465 U.S. 1038, 104 S.Ct. 1316, 79 L.Ed.2d 712, relied upon heavily by the defendants, does not support their......
  • Atlantic-Inland, Inc. v. Town of Union, ATLANTIC-INLAN
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • December 12, 1984
    ...restraints under the Donnelly Act (e.g., Atkin v. Union Processing, 90 A.D.2d 332, 336, 457 N.Y.S.2d 152, aff'd. 59 N.Y.2d 919, 466 N.Y.S.2d 293, 453 N.E.2d 522). Thus, we need not test the ordinance by application of discrete provisions of the Constitution or anti-monopoly statutes, for in......
  • Hanley v. Williamson
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 7, 1992
    ...of defendant should be given great weight (see, Atkin v. Union Processing Corp., 90 A.D.2d 332, 457 N.Y.S.2d 152, affd. 59 N.Y.2d 919, 466 N.Y.S.2d 293, 453 N.E.2d 522, cert. denied 465 U.S. 1038, 104 S.Ct. 1316, 79 L.Ed.2d 712). The record before us supports the IAS court's finding that th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • New York. Practice Text
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library State Antitrust Practice and Statutes (FIFTH). Volume II
    • December 9, 2014
    ...483 N.Y.S.2d 508, 509 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984); Atkin v. Union Processing Corp . , 457 N.Y.S.2d 152, 155-56 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982), aff’d , 453 N.E.2d 522 (N.Y. 1983); In re Freeman’s Estate, 341 N.Y.S.2d 511, 514 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973), aff’d on other grounds , 311 N.E.2d 480 (N.Y. 1974); Alexa......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT