Atkinson v. Atkinson, s. 41320-41322
Decision Date | 19 February 1985 |
Docket Number | Nos. 41320-41322,s. 41320-41322 |
Citation | 326 S.E.2d 206,254 Ga. 70 |
Parties | ATKINSON v. ATKINSON. CHUBB GROUP OF INSURANCE COMPANIES v. ATKINSON et al. GENERAL ACCIDENT GROUP v. ATKINSON et al. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
A. Paul Cadenhead, Hurt, Richardson, Garner, Todd & Cadenhead, R. Dennis Withers, Brent J. Kaplan, Atlanta, for Thomas H. Atkinson in No. 41320 and for Judith Ellen Atkinson et al in Nos. 41321 and 41322.
Long, Weinberg, Ansley & Wheeler, Palmer H. Ansley, Joseph W. Watkins, Atlanta, for Judith Ellen Atkinson et al. in Nos. 41320 and 41322 and for Chubb Group of Ins. Companies in No. 41321.
Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hiers, James B. Hiers, Jr., Michael H. Schroder, Atlanta, for Judith Ellen Atkinson et al. in Nos. 41320 and 41321 and for General Acc. Group in No. 41322.
Meals & Parks, P.C., Robert N. Meals, Larry H. Chesin, Neely & Player, James A. Eichelberger, Randall H. Davis, Lokey & Bowden, Glenn Frick, Atlanta, for Judith Ellen Atkinson et al. in all cases.
In this multi-party suit for declaratory judgment, the trial court granted permanent equitable relief; e.g., rescinding a settlement agreement entered into in a wrongful death case. This court therefore has jurisdiction. Compare Felton v. Chandler, 201 Ga. 347(4), 39 S.E.2d 654 (1946).
In July, 1979, a divorce was granted to Thomas and Judith Atkinson, but the alimony and child custody issues were reserved. In September, their 15-year- old daughter, Tracy, was critically injured while riding as a passenger in an automobile driven by Peter Tranakos, a minor, when it and an automobile driven by James Spalding, also a minor, collided. While Tracy lay hospitalized in a coma, a consent order was entered placing her in her mother's temporary custody and requiring her father to pay her medical expenses.
On the night of the accident, Peter Tranakos was driving a car owned by his father and insured by Royal Globe Insurance Companies. James Spalding was driving a car owned by his grandfather and insured by General Accident Life & Assurance Corp., a member of the General Accident Group. Spalding's grandfather also had an excess liability policy which was issued by a member company of the Chubb Group. James Spalding was also an insured under his father's automobile policy issued by Commercial Union Insurance Company.
Following Tracy's death, her mother, Judith Atkinson, instituted suit for wrongful death naming as defendants the two minor drivers and their fathers, as well as James Spalding's grandfather, alleging that the automobiles involved in the collision were family purpose vehicles furnished to the minors by the adult defendants.
Tracy's father, Thomas Atkinson, moved to be allowed to intervene in the wrongful death action, but his motion was denied. He then instituted a suit for the wrongful death of his daughter, but it was dismissed on motion for summary judgment. Thereafter, Judith Atkinson entered into a Release, Covenant and Indemnity Agreement with the defendants in her wrongful death action and their insurance companies. The agreement provides that in consideration of the receipt of $110,000, Judith Atkinson releases the named defendants in her wrongful death case and their insurers from any and all claims arising from the injuries to and death of Tracy Atkinson, except that she did not release any claim Thomas Atkinson might have for the expenses of Tracy's last illness, funeral and burial. Judith also agreed to indemnify and hold harmless the individual defendants and their insurers for any loss sustained by them on account of any claim for damages arising from the injuries to and death of Tracy, except for her father's claim for the expenses of her last illness, funeral and burial. A consent judgment was entered accordingly in the mother's wrongful death case, and Thomas Atkinson filed notice of appeal, appealing the denial of his motion to intervene therein.
At this point, Judith and Thomas Atkinson signed an agreement settling the unresolved alimony and property issues in their divorce action. Paragraph 11 of that agreement reads, in relevant part, as follows: 1
Before the alimony settlement agreement was approved by the court, this court held in Atkinson v. Atkinson, 249 Ga. 247, 290 S.E.2d 423 (1982), that Thomas Atkinson's motion to intervene in his wife's wrongful death action should have been granted because the temporary custody order did not divest him of his cause of action for the wrongful death of their child.
In the final judgment in the divorce action, the trial court rejected paragraph 11 of the alimony settlement agreement, above, stating that: No appeal was taken from this order.
After Thomas Atkinson prevailed in this court and intervened in his former wife's wrongful death action, she filed this declaratory judgment action, naming him as a defendant along with the defendants in the wrongful death case and their insurance companies. In the declaratory judgment action, the trial court made the following rulings: (1) Judith Atkinson's settlement agreement in the wrongful death action "must be set aside for mutual mistake of law and fact that she had the right and power to enter into a total settlement of such cause of action when in fact such cause of action was vested in her and Thomas H. Atkinson jointly." The consent judgment incorporating the wrongful death settlement agreement was also set aside and Judith Atkinson was ordered to repay the $110,000. (2) The court declared that paragraph 11 of the alimony settlement agreement between Judith and Thomas is still binding on the parties and is construed as an indemnity and surety agreement whereby he agreed that she should recover $110,000. He was ordered to pay her $110,000 simultaneously with her repayment of the $110,000. The court's substitution for paragraph 11 was also construed as a guarantee by Thomas that Judith will recover $110,000. (3) Judith was directed to enter a voluntary dismissal with prejudice in the joint action for the wrongful death of Tracy so that Thomas alone may proceed to recover the full value of Tracy's life. (4) Although General Accident had paid out its policy limits, upon its receipt of $35,000 of the $110,000, it will not have done so and its duties under the policy therefore have not ended; furthermore, even if the policy limits were exhausted, it still has the primary duty to provide defenses to its insureds. (5) The excess coverage provided by a member of the Chubb Group comes into play when General Accident's coverage is exhausted, and the coverage provided by Commercial Union comes into play only when the Chubb Group coverage is exhausted.
Thomas Atkinson, the Chubb Group and General Accident each appeal.
1. Mr. Atkinson enumerates as error the overruling of his motion for summary judgment, urging that declaratory judgment is not an available remedy as against him for the reason that the issues raised as to him can be resolved in the wrongful death action into which he has intervened. He urges further that it was error to stay proceedings in that wrongful death action because he is entitled to a prompt trial of his wrongful death claim.
We find that declaratory judgment does lie to determine General Accident's duty to defend, see Shield Ins. Co. v. Hutchins, 149 Ga.App. 742(2), 256 S.E.2d 108 (1979), and thus suit for declaratory judgment naming all parties and the order staying the wrongful death action were appropriate. Moreover, in view of the requirement that Mrs. Atkinson refund the $110,000 settlement to its payors, it would be inappropriate to leave that requirement in effect without resolving Mr. Atkinson's obligation, if any, to reimburse her. Finally, this litigation has been prolonged and made complicated because Mr. Atkinson was not originally allowed to become a party to the wrongful death action. 2 Were he now to be dismissed as a party to this litigation, the wrongful death action would not be expedited and likely would be more prolonged and complicated.
The trial court did not err in denying Mr. Atkinson's motion for summary judgment or in staying the wrongful death action.
2. The next issue which must be resolved, raised by all the appellants, is whether the trial court erred in setting aside the wrongful death settlement agreement and consent judgment entered into by Judith Atkinson and all the defendants except Thomas Atkinson. We find that it did.
OCGA § 23-2-21 provides that: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Christian v. Sizemore
...v. State Auto. & Casualty Underwriters, 32 Colo.App. 62, 508 P.2d 402, aff'd, 183 Colo. 284, 516 P.2d 623 (1973); Atkinson v. Atkinson, 254 Ga. 70, 326 S.E.2d 206 (1985); Reagor v. Travelers Ins. Co., 92 Ill.App.3d 99, 47 Ill.Dec. 507, 415 N.E.2d 512 (1980); Baca v. New Mexico State Highway......
-
Mut. Assurance Soc'y Virginia v. Fed. Ins. Co.
...(South Dakota law); LeMars Mut. Ins. Co. v. Farm & City Ins. Co., 494 N.W.2d 216, 218-19 (Iowa 1992) (Iowa law); Atkinson v. Atkinson, 254 Ga. 70, 326 S.E.2d 206, 214 (Ga. 1985) (Georgia law); Rivere v. Heroman, 688 So.2d 1293 (La. App. 1997) (Louisiana law); Bosco v. Bauermeister, 571 N.W.......
-
Travelers Prop. Cas. Co. of Am. v. TT Club Mut. Ins.
...a provision that stated the policy only provided excess coverage in the event of an accident involving a non-owned vehicle. 254 Ga. at 76-77, 326 S.E.2d at 213-14. The Supreme Court found that the policy in question was "written to provide primary coverage" and "[o]nly when it [was] called ......
-
Monroe Guar. Ins. Co. v. Langreck
...any type of primary coverage, excess provisions arising in regular policies in any manner, or escape clauses." Atkinson v. Atkinson, 254 Ga. 70, 326 S.E.2d 206, 214 (1985) (quoting Appleman, Insurance Law and Practice, § 4909.85 (1981)). See also Occidental Fire & Cas. Co. v. Brocious, 772 ......
-
Insurance - Stephen M. Schatz, Stephen L. Cotter, and Bradley S. Wolff
...223. Id. (emphasis in original). 224. Id. at 927 (brackets and alteration in original) (emphasis omitted) (quoting Atkinson v. Atkinson, 254 Ga. 70, 77, 326 S.E.2d 206, 214 (1985)). 225. Id. at 926-27. 226. See Cordell, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83604. 227. See supra Part III.A.1. 228. 282 Ga. ......