Atkinson v. Brady
Decision Date | 14 February 1893 |
Parties | ATKINSON v. BRADY et al. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from circuit court, Buchanan county; A. M. Woodson, Judge.
Action by Frank M. Atkinson against W. H. Brady and others. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiff appeals. Reversed.
Stauber & Crandall, for appellant. Hall & Pike, for respondents.
This is an action in partition. The petition shows that Nellie Brady died in 1889 seised of certain real estate in Buchanan county, and left surviving her a husband and five children; that plaintiff succeeded to the curtesy interest of the husband and the share of one of the children of deceased; sets out the interests of the other defendants; and prays for partition. Defendants demurred to the petition on the ground that plaintiff, being the owner of the curtesy and the undivided one-fifth interest in the remainder only, was not entitled to have the land partitioned. The demurrer was sustained, and, the plaintiff declining to plead further, judgment was rendered for defendants, from which plaintiff appeals to this court.
It will be observed from the foregoing statement that the sole question presented in this case for our consideration is whether the plaintiff, being the owner of the curtesy, together with an undivided one-fifth interest in the remainder, is entitled to have partition of such estate as against the other defendants, owners of the estate in remainder. Section 3339, Rev. St. 1879, provides that when lands, tenements, or hereditaments are held in joint tenancy, tenancy in common, or coparcenary, including estates in fee, for life, or for years, tenancy by the curtesy and in dower, may file petition in the circuit court of the proper county, asking for the admeasurement and setting off of any dower interest therein, and partition of the remainder. While, by the terms of this section of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Virgin v. Kennedy
...as such owner of interests therein, he had the right to have partition of said lands between himself and the others in interest. Atkinson v. Brady, 114 Mo. 200; Reinders v. Koppelmann, 68 Mo. 501; Preston v. Brant, 96 Mo. 552. (2) Under Sec. 3346, R.S. 1879, being Sec. 48, p. 616, G.S. 1865......
-
Virgin v. Kennedy
...tenant in common with other owners, which entitled him to invoke partition thereof between himself and such contenants in common. [Atkinson v. Brady, supra, which plaintiff owned a life estate and a one-fifth interest in the fee; Rupp v. Molitor, supra; Byars v. Howe, supra.] We think there......
-
Borchers v. Borchers
... ... share of the lands. As such she was entitled to maintain an ... action to partition the property. Atkinson v. Brady, ... 114 Mo. 200, 21 S.W. 480; Rupp v. Moliter, 320 Mo ... 938, 9 S.W. 2d 609; Virgin v. Kennedy, 326 Mo. 400, ... 32 S.W. 2d 91; Cooper ... ...
-
Jones v. Cook
... ... Ex parte O'Brien, 127 Mo. 477; Ecton v ... Tomlison, 278 Mo. 282, 212 S.W. 865; Klingelhoefer ... v. Smith, 171 Mo. 455, 71 S.W. 1008; Atkinson v ... Brady, 114 Mo. 200, 21 S.W. 480; Wallace v ... Crank, 324 Mo. 1114, 26 S.W.2d 601; Duncan v ... Duncan, 324 Mo. 167, 23 S.W.2d 91; White ... ...