ATLANTA DWELLINGS, INC. v. Wright, No. S99A1395
| Decision Date | 06 March 2000 |
| Docket Number | No. S99A1396., No. S99A1395 |
| Citation | 272 Ga. 231,527 S.E.2d 854 |
| Parties | ATLANTA DWELLINGS, INC. v. WRIGHT et al. (Two Cases). |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
McCalla, Raymer, Padrick, Cobb, Nichols & Clark, John G. Aldridge, Jr., Scott L. Nathan, Marissa G. Connors, Atlanta, for appellant. Lawson & Thornton, George O. Lawson, Jr., Alton Hornsby III, Atlanta, for appellee.
Atlanta Dwellings, Inc. (ADI) appeals from two separate orders granting interlocutory injunctions prohibiting foreclosure under a deed to secure debt executed by Mattie B. Wright. Finding no abuse of the court's discretion, we affirm both rulings.
Private Mortgage Funding Corporation ("Private Mortgage") held several commercial loans executed by Wright, including a promissory note secured by property known as Azalea Gardens Apartments and an assignment of rents and leases. When Wright defaulted on the Azalea Gardens loan, among others, Private Mortgage obtained a judgment against her to satisfy the debts. Wright made some payments on this judgment, but then in October 1998, entered into a forbearance agreement with Private Mortgage whereby she agreed to satisfy her other loans, leaving the Azalea Gardens loan as her only outstanding debt; and Private Mortgage agreed on several conditions to a short payoff of the Azalea Gardens loan. Private Mortgage assigned to ADI all its rights under the forbearance agreement, the court judgment, and the Azalea Gardens security deed and assignment of rents and leases.
Thereafter, ADI served Wright with written notice of default of the forbearance agreement and the deed to secure debt based on allegations that she failed to pay real property ad valorem taxes for the years 1992 through 1997; and that she transferred the Azalea Gardens property to Azalea Gardens, Inc. in 1993 without the lender's consent. When Wright failed to satisfy ADI's demands that she cure the default, ADI filed the present complaint to: (1) allow a nonjudicial foreclosure of the property; (2) issue an order restraining Wright from disposing of rents, issues and profits in connection with the Azalea Gardens property; and (3) declare that ADI's interest in the rents, issues and profits of the property was perfected. ADI asserted it was entitled to such relief under the terms of the deed to secure debt and the forbearance agreement.
In response, Wright sought and was granted a temporary restraining order staying foreclosure. After an evidentiary hearing, the court granted her motion for an interlocutory injunction.1 A detailed order followed in which the court enumerated a series of remaining questions as to whether the forbearance agreement was intended to serve as a waiver of any default of loan documents executed prior thereto. As to the alleged tax default, the court noted that the language of the forbearance agreement acknowledged Wright's "failure to pay real property taxes"; and as to the alleged 1993 transfer of the property, there remained questions as to whether ADI effectively waived this incident of default by failing to object for more than five years. The order recited:
There exist significant conflicts in and on the record regarding conditions and allegations of default by [Wright] to issue an injunction enjoining foreclosure of the subject property during the pendency of this action ... the mere existence of these ambiguities and conflicts mandate the issuance of an interlocutory injunction to establish and maintain the status quo until these matters can be determined on their merits.2
Wright tendered certain funds into the registry of the court as security for the alleged debt and foreclosure was enjoined during pendency of the underlying action. In Case No. S99A1395, ADI appeals from that order.
Shortly thereafter, ADI served Wright with yet another notice of demand in which it alleged a separate event of default, namely, her alleged failure to pay 1998 real property ad valorem taxes. It again advised Wright of its intent to conduct a non-judicial power of sale foreclosure of the property if the default were not timely cured. This prompted Wright's ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ceasar v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., A13A0019.
...and that the agreements did not constitute a waiver of Wells Fargo's right to strict performance. Compare Atlanta Dwellings v. Wright, 272 Ga. 231, 234, 527 S.E.2d 854 (2000) (holding that questions remained regarding whether forbearance agreement and lender's course of conduct constituted ......
-
Martinez v. DaVita, Inc.
...discretion under OCGA § 9-5-8 in deciding whether to grant a request for an interlocutory injunction. (Cit.)' Atlanta Dwellings v. Wright, 272 Ga. 231, 233, 527 S.E.2d 854 (2000)." Byelick v. Michel Herbelin USA, 275 Ga. 505, 506(1), 570 S.E.2d 307 (2002). The exercise of this discretion wi......
-
Edward v. Bank of Am., N.A., CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11 -CV-2465-RWS-LTW
...duty to exercise the power of sale in a deed to secure debt fairly, the debtor may obtain injunctive relief. Atlanta Dwellings, Inc. v. Wright, 272 Ga. 231, 233 (2000). Georgia Courts have found that a bank breaches the duty to fairly exercise the power of sale created by O.C.G.A. § 23-2-11......
-
Morgan v. Ocwen Loan Servicing Llc
...foreclosure sale in a wrongful foreclosure action where the authority to foreclose is in question. See Atlanta Dwellings, Inc. v. Wright, 272 Ga. 231, 527 S.E.2d 854, 856 (2000); West v. Koufman, 259 Ga. 505, 384 S.E.2d 664, 666 (1989); Cotton v. First Nat'l Bank of Gwinnett Co., 235 Ga. 51......
-
Real Property - T. Daniel Brannan and William J. Sheppard
...for brokerage services." Id. (citing Bechenko, 244 Ga. at 734, 261 S.E.2d at 644-45). 161. Id. at 16, 525 S.E.2d at 739. 162. 272 Ga. 231, 527 s.e.2d 854 (2000). 163. Id. at 232-33, 527 s.e.2d at 855. 164. Id. at 231-32, 527 s.e.2d at 855. 165. Id. at 232, 527 s.e.2d at 855. 166. Id. 167. I......