Atlanta Hanggliders & Ultralights, Inc. v. Rountree, 67342
| Citation | 169 Ga.App. 647,314 S.E.2d 679 |
| Decision Date | 31 January 1984 |
| Docket Number | No. 67342,67342 |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
| Parties | ATLANTA HANGGLIDERS & ULTRALIGHTS, INC. et al. v. ROUNTREE et al. |
Roy C. Roberts, Alpharetta, for appellants.
James N. Butterworth, Cornelia, for appellees.
Atlanta Hanggliders and Ultralights, Inc. and Pterodactyl, Ltd. appeal from an order of the trial court denying their motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The trial court's order is an interlocutory order which is not appealable without a certificate of immediate review. OCGA § 5-6-34(b) (Code Ann. § 6-701); Davis v. Davis, 242 Ga. 322, 249 S.E.2d 90 (1978). Therefore, appellant's appeal must be dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
Wells v. Wells
...decision on a challenge to jurisdiction is a non-appealable interlocutory order. See Atlanta Hanggliders & Ultralights, Inc. v. Rountree, 169 Ga.App. 647, 314 S.E.2d 679, 680 (Ga.Ct.App.1984) (holding that an "order of the trial court denying [a] motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction .......
- Stevens v. State
-
Griffith v. Georgia Bd. of Dentistry
...review from the lower court and an appropriate application to this court. OCGA § 5-6-34(b); see Atlanta Hanggliders, etc., Inc. v. Rountree, 169 Ga.App. 647, 314 S.E.2d 679 (1984). Compare Shannon v. Allen Automatic Transmission, 172 Ga.App. 88, 322 S.E.2d 99 (1984), and Long v. Bruner, 171......
- Verhine v. State