Atlanta Newspapers, Inc. v. Grimes
| Decision Date | 15 September 1959 |
| Docket Number | No. 20529,20529 |
| Citation | 215 Ga. 324,110 S.E.2d 343 |
| Parties | ATLANTA NEWSPAPERS, INC., et al. v. T. Ralph GRIMES, Sheriff, et al. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
B. P. Gambrell, John E. Dougherty, Atlanta, Stephens, Fortson, Bentley & Griffin, Athens, for plaintiffs in error.
Harold Sheats, Griffin Patrick, Atlanta, for defendants in error.
Syllabus Opinion by the Court
Beginning with the decision in Gulf Paving Co. v. City of Atlanta, 149 Ga. 114, 99 S.E. 374, this court has held that, where the question presented for decision requires only an application of unquestioned and unambiguous provisions of the state or federal Constitution to a given state of facts, jurisdiction of such cases is in the Court of Appeals, and not in this court, and has therefore transferred such cases to the Court of Appeals. See, in this connection, McGill v. State of Georgia, 209 Ga. 282, 71 S.E.2d 548; Jackson v. State, 203 Ga. 570, 47 S.E.2d 588; Gaines v. State, 205 Ga. 210, 52 S.E.2d 847; Boyett v. State, 205 Ga. 370, 53 S.E.2d 919; Robinson v. State, 209 Ga. 48, 70 S.E.2d 514; Suttles v. Hill Crest Cemetery, 209 Ga. 160, 71 S.E.2d 217; Jones v. Chandler, 209 Ga. 498, 74 S.E.2d 4; Giles v. State, 212 Ga. 465, 93 S.E.2d 739; Perkins v. Hattiesburg Brick Work, 212 Ga. 804, 96 S.E.2d 361, and cases therein cited. The present case comes within that class, and it is
Transferred to the Court of Appeals.
All the Justices concur.
I am fully convinced that the decisions upon which the opinion rests erroneously construe the Constitution wherein the jurisdiction of this court is fixed. Those decisions and the numerous other decisions hold without qualification that, where the constitutional provision is plain and unambiguous, the Court of Appeals and not this court had jurisdiction to apply the Constitution to any given state of facts, irrespective of what the facts may be. Until and unless overruled by a decision of this court, concurred in by all the Justices, those decisions are controlling. And since it is impossible at this time to obtain a concurrence of all the Justices to that effect, I have no choice but to follow them, which requires a concurrence in the transfer of the writ of error to the Court of Appeals. I am authorized to state that HEAD, CANDLER, and HAWKINS, JJ., join me in this special concurrence.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Allen v. State
...and it is accordingly transferred to that court. See McGill v. State of Georgia, 209 Ga. 282, 71 S.E.2d 548; Atlanta Newspapers, Inc. v. Grimes, 215 Ga. 324, 110 S.E.2d 343; and Edwards v. State, 217 Ga. 804, 125 S.E.2d 506 and the cases there cited. We have not overlooked or failed to cons......
-
Atlanta Newspapers, Inc. v. State of Webb, 20602
...Atlanta, for defendant in error. Syllabus Opinion by the Court CANDLER, Justice. Under the ruling by this court in Atlanta Newspapers, Inc. v. Grimes, Ga.Sup., 110 S.E.2d 343 the Court of Appeals and not this Court has jurisdiction of the instant Transferred to the Court of Appeals. All the......