Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Florida Fine Fruit Company
| Decision Date | 14 June 1927 |
| Parties | ATLANTIC COAST LINE R. CO. v. FLORIDA FINE FRUIT COMPANY |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Petition for rehearing on the part of respondent was granted in this cause for the purpose of further considering whether or not the petition for certiorari should be denied on the ground that a good case was made on the general negligence and delay counts.
The record has been carefully re-examined. The verdict was general and the errors on which the judgment below was quashed so permeated and affected the entire proceeding, we think, that our former judgment herein must be and is hereby approved, and the judgment of the civil court of record as affirmed by the circuit court of Duval county is hereby quashed.
All concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
South Atlantic S.S. Co. of Delaware v. Tutson
...Ry. Express Co. v. Weatherford, 86 Fla. 626, 98 So. 820; Atlantic C. L. R. Co. v. Florida Fine Fruit Co., 93 Fla. 161, 112 So. 66, 113 So. 384; Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. Broome, 99 Fla. 272, So. 149; State ex rel. Jordan v. Pattishall, 99 Fla. 296, 126 So. 147; Salario v. Latin-Am. Bank, 104......
-
Jones v. Cook
...appellate proceedings. A similar question was presented in Atlantic C. L. R. R. Co. v. Florida Fine Fruit Co., 93 Fla. 161, 112 So. 66, 113 So. 384; Brinson v. Tharin, 99 Fla. 696, 127 313; Ulsch v. Mountain City Mill Co., 103 Fla. 932, 138 So. 483, 484, 140 So. 218; Des Rocher & Watkins To......
-
Janet Realty Corp. v. Hoffman's, Inc.
...are calculated to materially injure the complaining party. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Florida Fine Fruit Co., 93 Fla. 161, 112 So. 66, 113 So. 384. The general purpose and function of the common law writ of certiorari as enunciated by this Court in the recent case of Goodkind v. Wolkowsk......
-
Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. Wells
...Express Co. v. Weatherford, 86 Fla. 626, 98 So. 820; Atlantic Coast Line Ry. Co. v. Florida Fine Fruit Co., 93 Fla. 161, 112 So. 66, 113 So. 384; and Brinson v. Tharin (Fla.) 127 313. In this connection it should be noted that, under the statute here under consideration, a statutory presump......