Attias v. Faroy Realty Co.
| Decision Date | 24 November 1992 |
| Docket Number | No. 92-800,92-800 |
| Citation | 609 So.2d 105 |
| Parties | 17 Fla. L. Weekly D2650 Jack P. ATTIAS, Appellant, v. FAROY REALTY COMPANY, a Florida Corporation, Emilio Faroy and Adriana Faroy, a/k/a Adriana Creel, Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Jack P. Attias, in pro. per.
Harold M. Braxton, Miami, for appellees.
Before HUBBART, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.
Jack P. Attias appeals a final order dismissing his action for attorney's fees against defendants Faroy Realty Company, Emilio Faroy and Adriana Faroy. We reverse.
First, defendants' motion to dismiss contended that Attias should have pursued attorney's fees by means of charging liens Attias filed in the litigation in which he represented defendants. This was an affirmative defense which did not appear on the face of plaintiff's complaint. This affirmative defense, therefore, could not be raised by motion to dismiss, for the motion required the court to consider matters outside the four corners of the complaint. See Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.110(d); Henry P. Trawick, Trawick's Florida Practice and Procedure Sec. 10-4, at 174 (1991 ed.).
Second, the charging lien is a security device which allows the attorney to recover fees by imposing a lien on a judgment or settlement obtained by his efforts for his client. See Litman v. Fine, Jacobson, Schwartz, Nash, Block & England, P.A., 517 So.2d 88, 90-92 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), review denied, 525 So.2d 879 (Fla.1988); see also Sinclair, Louis, Siegel, Heath, Nussbaum & Zavertnik, P.A. v. Baucom, 428 So.2d 1383, 1384 (Fla.1983).
Here the plaintiff alleges that there was an agreement to employ him as an attorney on an hourly basis. Plaintiff has elected not to pursue the charging liens. * Instead he has brought suit against defendants for breach of a written contract, quantum meruit, and account stated. We know of no rule which prevents the attorney from abandoning the charging lien and proceeding against the former clients on ordinary contract principles.
The order under review is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.
* The record does not reveal the reason for this, but a logical explanation would be that there were no proceeds accruing to the benefit of Attias' clients in the original actions.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Vause v. Bay Medical Center
...Fla. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., 604 So.2d 850 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), rev. denied, 613 So.2d 2 (Fla.1993); Attias v. Faroy Realty Co., 609 So.2d 105 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). Even a relatively straightforward affirmative defense, such as one based upon the statute of limitations, is not a basi......
-
Mettler, Inc. v. Ellen Tracy, Inc.
...granted on the basis of affirmative defenses unless the affirmative defenses appear on the face of the pleading. Attias v. Faroy Realty Co., 609 So.2d 105 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Board of County Com'rs of Polk County, Fla. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 604 So.2d 850 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 61......
-
Howard v. Greenwich Ins. Co.
...determined by way of a motion to dismiss." Garnac Grain Co. v. Mejia, 962 So. 2d 408, 410 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) ; Attias v. Faroy Realty Co., 609 So. 2d 105 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (holding that an affirmative defense cannot be raised by a motion to dismiss if the motion requires the court to cons......
-
Newberry Square Fla. Laundromat, LLC v. Jim's Coin Laundry & Dry Cleaners, Inc.
...to dismiss if the motion requires the court "to consider matters outside the four corners of the complaint." Attias v. Faroy Realty Co. , 609 So. 2d 105, 106 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) ; see also Williams v. Gaffin Indus. Servs., Inc. , 88 So. 3d 1027, 1029 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (observing that " ‘[e]......
-
Lien cases
...from abandoning the charging lien and proceeding against the former clients on ordinary contract principles. Attias v. Faroy Realty Co. , 609 So.2d 105, 106 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). 2. Attorneys’ Trust Accounts: The Supreme Court in Mones v. Smith , 486 So.2d 559 (Fla. 1986), held that attorneys......