Austero v. National Cas. Co.
Decision Date | 18 August 1978 |
Citation | 84 Cal.App.3d 1,148 Cal.Rptr. 653 |
Parties | Julius S. AUSTERO, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. NATIONAL CASUALTY COMPANY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, Defendant and Appellant. Civ. 17929. |
Court | California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
The action in the trial court was for breach of contract, declaratory relief, emotional distress, so-called bad faith, and for fraud brought by an insured in a first party case against his own disability insurance carrier (the Company). Trial was had before a jury. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $67,200 compensatory and $336,000 exemplary damages. By later stipulation of counsel, $2,800 in interest was added to the award. The Company now appeals from the judgment entered on the verdict.
In 1957, plaintiff as a member of a group developed from the roster of the Orange County Bar Association subscribed for disability coverage under a policy written by the Company. In 1969, a new policy was issued, which provided in pertinent part:
In January 1973, a third policy was issued which provided in pertinent part:
Plaintiff entered private law practice in 1955, and, until 1971, maintained a successful and prosperous practice. 1 In 1971, plaintiff's son, Wayne, passed the California State Bar Examination and became an associate in his father's firm. During 1971, according to the later statements of both Wayne and Mrs. Austero, plaintiff's work load dropped markedly, and from 1971 to 1974, the practice was maintained largely by Wayne. In September 1971, plaintiff saw his family physician, Dr. MacLachlan. He complained of sinus trouble and memory loss. The doctor observed that during the previous four months plaintiff had experienced loss of memory and occasional incidents where his mind would go blank. Plaintiff's firm ended the year 1971 with a gross income of $85,313 and a net income of $24,221. His activities for the year comprised in part: 258 hearings as compared with 284 in 1970 (or 21.5 per month), 578 client appointments, as compared with 640 in 1970 (or 48.2 per month), and 16 depositions, as compared with 11 in 1970 (or 1.3 per month). 2
In 1972, plaintiff maintained daily office hours of 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. However, his secretary later stated that he spends much of his time When plaintiff took depositions, he usually had the questions prepared in advance on paper and would simply read them. He also made court appearances, but did so largely at arraignments and default divorces where extensive attorney participation is not required. Wayne testified at trial that during 1972 his father drafted no pleadings or briefs and performed no legal research. He further testified that most of the work he did himself. Both Wayne and plaintiff's secretary agreed that plaintiff conducted his last contested trial in March of 1972.
At trial, the Company introduced evidence indicating that beside making court appearances for arraignments and default divorces, plaintiff also represented clients at order to show cause hearings, negotiated pleas in criminal cases and appeared at sentencing hearings. During the year 1972, plaintiff appeared at a total of 251 hearings (or an average of 20.9 per month), had 689 scheduled office appointments (or 57.3 per month) and took, 16 depositions. The firm grossed $80,972 in 1972 and netted $28,951.
In May of 1972, plaintiff was referred to Dr. Berle I. Barth, a neurologist, by Dr. Samuel J. Camerata. Plaintiff complained to Dr. Barth of "impaired memory . . . difficulty in spelling, inability to remember what he . . . read, misplacing objects, increased irritability, all of which (had) been present for six to twelve months, and (were) increasing in frequency and severity." Other than these symptoms, plaintiff denied having any medical problems other than phlebitis of his left leg. After concluding a full neurological examination, Dr. Barth composed the following note:
Dr. Barth also performed an electroencephalogram which indicated "slowing, consistent with generalized brain disturbance." He further ordered a series of psychological tests to be performed "to determine (plaintiff's) intellectual functions." 3 He informed plaintiff that, in his opinion, plaintiff was "seriously intellectually impaired" and should be hospitalized, however, plaintiff declined to be hospitalized.
At trial, Dr. Barth testified that the disease plaintiff suffered from was progressively disabling that one afflicted with it could continue to function for a period of time, and that a man in plaintiff's condition, as of May 1972 would experience "some diminution of his abilities." He further testified that the onset of pre-senile dementia could not accurately be pinpointed. He stated his conclusion that in the spring of 1972, plaintiff He opined that a man in plaintiff's condition would not be capable of reading and interpreting cases and drawing principles of law from them.
On July 13, 1972, Dr. Stanley van den Noort examined plaintiff who complained of a...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
California Shoppers, Inc. v. Royal Globe Ins. Co.
...dealing; hence the reversal. In the course of its opinion the Paulfrey court noted the full range of cases from Austero v. National Cas. Co., 84 Cal.App.3d 1, 148 Cal.Rptr. 653, to Silberg v. California Life Ins. Co., supra, 11 Cal.3d 452, 113 Cal.Rptr. 711, 521 P.2d 1103. In Austero, the c......
-
Austero v. Washington National Ins. Co.
...have been unreasonable. 3 (Blake v. Aetna Life Ins. Co. (1979) 99 Cal.App.3d 901, 918, 160 Cal.Rptr. 528; Austero v. National Cas. Co. (1978) 84 Cal.App.3d 1, 148 Cal.Rptr. 653, disapproved on other grounds in Egan v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co. (1979) 24 Cal.3d 809, 824, fn. 7, 169 Cal.Rptr. ......
-
Moore v. American United Life Ins. Co.
...689. 6 (McMackin v. Great American Reserve Ins. Co. (1971) 22 Cal.App.3d 428, 432, 437, 99 Cal.Rptr. 227; see Austero v. National Cas. Co. (1978) 84 Cal.App.3d 1, 19-20, 148 It is also clear that, read literally, the applicable insuring clause in the Anderson policy failed miserably to meet......
-
Love v. Fire Ins. Exchange
...of mind comes from the assurance that the insured will receive prompt payment of money in times of need. (Austero v. National Cas. Co. (1978) 84 Cal.App.3d 1, 29-30, 148 Cal.Rptr. 653.) Because peace of mind and security are the principal benefits for the insured, the courts have imposed sp......
-
Commonly Used Experts
.... . .” Love v. Fire Ins. Exchange , 221 Cal. App. 3d 1136, 1148-1149, 271 Cal. Rptr. 246 (1990); accord, Austero v. National Cas. Co. , 84 Cal. App. 3d 1, 30, 148 Cal. Rptr. 653 (1978). In other words, an insurer is entitled to give its own interests consideration when evaluating the merits......
-
Table of Cases
..., §532 Atrium Unit Owners Assn. v. King 585 S.E. 2d 545, 548, 266 Va. 288 (S. Ct. Va. 2003), §102.2 Austero v. National Cas. Co. , 84 Cal. App. 3d 1, 148 Cal. Rptr. 653 (1978), §582 Austin v. American Assn. of Neurological Surgeons, 253 F. 3d 967 (7th Cir. 2001), §532 Avivvi v. Centro Medic......
-
Commonly Used Experts
.... . .” Love v. Fire Ins. Exchange , 221 Cal. App. 3d 1136, 1148-1149, 271 Cal. Rptr. 246 (1990); accord, Austero v. National Cas. Co. , 84 Cal. App. 3d 1, 30, 148 Cal. Rptr. 653 (1978). In other words, an insurer is entitled to give its own interests consideration when evaluating the merits......
-
CHAPTER 3
...to receive had the contract been honored by the insurer. To the extent it is inconsistent herewith, Austero v. National Cas. Co.(1978) 84 Cal. App. 3d 1, 24-25 [148 Cal. Rptr. 653], is disapproved.[41] There were additional circumstances questioning plaintiff’s good faith. During his trip a......