Austin v. Barnett Bank of South Florida, N.A., 85-269
| Decision Date | 10 July 1985 |
| Docket Number | No. 85-269,85-269 |
| Citation | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1684,472 So.2d 830 |
| Parties | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1684 Sybil AUSTIN, Petitioner, v. BARNETT BANK OF SOUTH FLORIDA, N.A., Respondent. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Rhea Grossman of Grossman & Eichenbaum, P.A., Miami, for petitioner.
Jeffrey Allan Hirsch and Marilyn Holifield of Holland & Knight, Fort Lauderdale, for respondent.
Petitioner seeks certiorari review of an order compelling the production of documents claimed to be privileged. The trial court's order was based, at least in part, on the fact that petitioner's assertion of the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination was untimely. We grant the petition for writ of certiorari.
As we interpret rule 1.380(d), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, its proscription that "[t]he failure to act described in this subdivision may not be excused on the ground that the discovery sought is objectionable unless the party failing to act has applied for a protective order as provided by Rule 1.280(c)" does not apply where the matters sought to be discovered are claimed to be privileged. This follows from the fact that rule 1.280(c) refers to issuance of a protective order only "to protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense ...." and does not refer to privilege. We think the omission was intentional and that the word "objectionable" in rule 1.380(d) therefore should be construed as referring only to items which are within the scope of discovery; that is, not privileged (see Insurance Co. of North America v. Noya, 398 So.2d 836 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981) ), but to which objection is made for one of the reasons set forth in rule 1.280(c). Thus rule 1.380(d) does not require timely objection to privileged matters. See Gross v. Security Trust Co., 462 So.2d 580 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). We certify direct conflict with American Funding, Limited v. Hill, 402 So.2d 1369 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), on this issue.
Where a claim of privilege is asserted, the trial court should hold an in camera inspection to review the discovery requested and determine whether assertion of the privilege is valid. Gross, 462 So.2d at 581; see also Meek v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 458 So.2d 412 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); DeLisi v. Bankers Insurance Co., 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).
We therefore grant the petition and quash the order under review.
CERTIORARI GRANTED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Rojas v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., 92-2234
...Memorial Regional Medical Ctr., Inc., 593 So.2d 1140 (Fla.1st DCA), rev. denied, 599 So.2d 1281 (Fla.1992); Austin v. Barnett Bank of S. Fla., N.A., 472 So.2d 830 (Fla.4th DCA 1985). See also Walton v. Dugger, 621 So.2d 1357 (Fla.1993) (advocating use of an in camera inspection in the conte......
-
Westco v. Scott Lewis' Gardening & Trimming
...4th DCA 2001); Am. Exp. Travel Related Servs. v. Cruz, 761 So.2d 1206, 1208-09 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Austin v. Barnett Bank of S. Fla., N.A., 472 So.2d 830, 830 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985) ("Where a claim of privilege is asserted, the trial court should hold an in camera inspection to review the dis......
-
Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. Egly
...has ample authority to conduct in camera inspection of items toward which the privilege is claimed, Austin v. Barnett Bank of South Florida, N.A., 472 So.2d 830 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), and in appropriate circumstances the court is always able to enter such protective orders as may be Last, pet......
-
Lovell Farms, Inc. v. Levy
...information constitutes a trade secret. See Kavanaugh v. Stump, 592 So.2d 1231, 1232 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); Austin v. Barnett Bank, 472 So.2d 830 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Scientific Games, Inc. v. Dittler Bros., Inc., 586 So.2d 1128, 1131 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Furthermore, a protective order can b......
-
Chapter 11-7 Judicial Resolution of Discovery Disputes
...Funding, Ltd. v. Hill, 402 So. 2d 1369 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); expressly disagreed with by Austin v. Barnett Bank of South Florida, N.A., 472 So. 2d 830 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985) (untimely objections as to privilege not waived).[50] See Harley Shipbuilding Corp. v. Fast Cats Ferry Service, LLC, 820 ......
-
Chapter 11-7 Judicial Resolution of Discovery Disputes
...Funding, Ltd. v. Hill, 402 So. 2d 1369 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); expressly disagreed with by Austin v. Barnett Bank of South Florida, N.A., 472 So. 2d 830 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985) (untimely objections as to privilege not waived).[50] See Harley Shipbuilding Corp. v. Fast Cats Ferry Service, LLC, 820 ......