Austin v. State, 23114.
| Decision Date | 02 May 1945 |
| Docket Number | No. 23114.,23114. |
| Citation | 187 S.W.2d 222 |
| Parties | AUSTIN v. STATE. |
| Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
Appeal from Criminal District Court, Tarrant County; Willis M. McGregor, Judge.
Ivory Mack Austin was convicted of theft, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
Jack Carter and W. E. Myres, both of Fort Worth, for appellant.
Ernest S. Goens, State's Atty., of Austin, for the State.
The appeal is from a sentence of five years in the penitentiary on a charge of theft.
The appellant brings forward three bills of exception in the transcript but the record is before this court without a statement of facts. Therefore, the court is unable to appraise said bills of exception. Article 760, Vernon's Ann.Code of Criminal Procedure, (cases cited under Note 6.)
Further, the bills are in question and answer form. The judge does not certify that it is necessary to have them in this form. Under the rules they cannot be considered. Jones v. State, 142 Tex.Cr.R. 426, 154 S.W.2d 456; Hyde v. State, 138 Tex.Cr.R. 457, 136 S.W.2d 850; Kodak v. State, 145 Tex.Cr.R. 55, 165 S.W.2d 908.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Lerma v. State
...457, 136 S.W.2d 850; Mallett v. State, Tex.Cr. App., 158 S.W.2d 792; Kodak v. State, 145 Tex.Cr.R. 55, 165 S.W.2d 908; Austin v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 187 S.W.2d 222; Vernon's Ann.C.C.P. Art. 667, Note Finding no reversible error in the record, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. On ......
-
Simpson v. State, 24256.
...p. 253, sec. 178; Humphrey v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 212 S.W.2d 159; Stroud v. State, 145 Tex.Cr. R. 264, 167 S.W.2d 526; Austin v. State, 148 Tex.Cr.R. 339, 187 S.W.2d 222; De Leon v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 201 S.W.2d 816; White v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 203 S. W.2d 222; Sharp v. State, Tex.Cr.App.......
-
De Leon v. State
...457, 136 S.W.2d 850; Mallett v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 158 S.W.2d 792; Kodak v. State, 145 Tex.Cr.R. 55, 165 S. W.2d 908; Austin v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 187 S.W.2d 222; Vernon's Ann.C.C.P., Art. 667, Note Under the court's bill it is probably permissible for us to consider the question of wheth......
-
Sheffield v. State, 23806.
...it cannot be considered. Vernon's Ann. C.C.P., Art. 667, Note 23; Green v. State, 144 Tex.Cr. R. 40, 160 S.W.2d 940; Austin v. State, 148 Tex.Cr.R. 339, 187 S.W.2d 222; Lerma v. State, Tex.Cr.R., 200 S.W.2d 635; DeLeon v. State, Tex. Cr. R., 201 S.W.2d By Bill of Exception No. 2 complaint i......