Autoworld of America Corp. v. Department of Highway Safety, 3D99-931.

Decision Date08 March 2000
Docket NumberNo. 3D99-931.,3D99-931.
Citation754 So.2d 76
PartiesAUTOWORLD OF AMERICA CORP., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY, etc., Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Stuart I. Levin, Miami, for appellant.

Enoch J. Whitney and Michael J. Alderman (Tallahassee), for appellee.

Before JORGENSON, COPE, and LEVY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Autoworld of America Corporation appeals a final order revoking its independent motor vehicle dealer license, after an informal hearing. On appeal, Autoworld argues that the findings of fact contained in the final order are not supported by competent substantial evidence.

Autoworld misapprehends the applicable principles under the Florida Administrative Procedure Act:

Choosing § 120.57(2) hearings in professional license disciplinary proceedings is similar to pleading guilty to the facts alleged in the administrative complaint, because they are not disputed. See F.S. § 120.569(1). This leaves only conclusions of law to be drawn as to whether the admitted facts constitute a violation of the statutes as charged and penalties to be imposed.

The Florida Bar, Florida Administrative Practice § 6.26, at 6-30 (5th ed.1997) (emphasis added). As stated during the proceeding below, the informal hearing is in essence a meeting, not an adjudicatory hearing to decide disputed issues of material fact.

On appeal, Autoworld now contends that one or more findings are not supported by competent substantial evidence because they were based on hearsay. In order to challenge the factual basis of the complaint, it would have been necessary for Autoworld to request a formal hearing under subsection 120.57(1), Florida Statutes, rather than an informal hearing under subsection 120.57(2). The logic of the situation is that when a formal hearing is requested, both parties will subpoena or produce the witnesses necessary for the proof of the case. In an informal hearing, there is no reason to bring witnesses, and Autoworld's hearsay objection is misplaced.

Alternatively, assuming arguendo that issue of competent substantial evidence were properly before us, there is still no basis for reversal. See Cohen v. Department of Business Regulation, Division of Parimutuel Wagering, 584 So.2d 1083, 1085 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) (in informal hearing, need objection to preserve hearsay issue for appeal)1; Griffith v. Department of Business Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering, 613 So.2d 930, 932 (Fla. 3d DCA 1...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Smith v. Fla. Dep't of Bus. & Prof'l Regulation
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 31, 2015
    ...imposed." Nicks v. Dep't of Bus. & Prof'l Regulation, 957 So.2d 65, 67 n. 1 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). See Autoworld of Am. Corp. v. Dep't of Highway Safety, 754 So.2d 76, 77 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (stating the purpose of informal hearings is to arrive at conclusions of law as to whether agreed facts......
  • Trisha's One Stop, Inc. v. Office of Fin. Regulation
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • January 29, 2014
    ...to dispute the Department's allegations, relying on Florida Administrative Code Rule 28–106.111); Autoworld of Am. Corp. v. Dep't of Highway Safety, 754 So.2d 76, 77 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (“In order to challenge the factual basis of the complaint, it would have been necessary for Autoworld to ......
  • Galvan v. Dep't of Health
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 20, 2019
    ...under this subsection are the obligation of the practitioner.§ 456.072, Fla. Stat. (2018).3 See Autoworld of Am. Corp. v. Dep't of Highway Safety, 754 So. 2d 76, 77 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (stating that the purpose of informal hearings is to arrive at conclusions of law as to whether agreed fact......
  • Nicks v. Dept. of Business and Prof. Reg.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • May 4, 2007
    ...complaint are deemed to be admitted. See Fla. Admin. Code R. 28-106.111(2) & (4); § 120.569(2)(c); Autoworld of America Corp. v. Dep't of Highway Safety, 754 So.2d 76, 77 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (recognizing that when the facts alleged in the administrative complaint are not disputed "[t]his lea......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Florida tax procedure: a primer.
    • United States
    • Florida Bar Journal Vol. 81 No. 6, June 2007
    • June 1, 2007
    ...assessment or the final notice issued during informal protest proceedings. (63) Autoworld of America Corp. v. Dep't of Highway Safety, 754 So. 2d 76, 77 (Fla. 3d D.C.A. (64) Fla. Stat. [section] 120.569(2)(b). (65) Fla. admin. Code [section] 28-106.303. (66) Fla. Stat. [section] 120.569(2)(......
  • Discovery in Administrative Proceedings: Whose Right and Who's Right?
    • United States
    • Florida Bar Journal Vol. 94 No. 6, November 2020
    • November 1, 2020
    ...Fin., Div. of Sec. & Inv'r Prot., 608 So. 2d 134, 136 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). (22) Autoworld of Am. Corp. v. Dep't of Highway Safety, 754 So. 2d 76, 77 (Fla. 3d DCA (23) FLA. STAT. [section]120.57(2)(a). (24) The record on appeal for a disputed fact hearing includes "notices, pleadings, mo......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT