Avery v. Guy
Decision Date | 27 January 1932 |
Docket Number | No. 576.,576. |
Citation | 202 N. C. 162,162 S.E. 217 |
Parties | AVERY et al. v. GUY et al. |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Appeal from Superior Court, Avery County; Sink, Judge.
Carrie Avery, guardian, and others against E. C. Guy and J. Walter Wright, trading as partners in a lumber business under some firm name. From judgment of nonsuit, Carrie Avery, guardian, appeals.
Affirmed.
The court below rendered the following judgment: "This cause coming on for hearing and being heard before His Honor, and it appearing to the Court upon the admitted facts that the plaintiffs are barred and estopped from further asserting their claim in this cause, it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiffs be and they are hereby nonsuited in this cause." Plaintiff Carrie Avery, guardian, excepted to the judgment as signed, assigned error, and appealed to the Supreme Court.
R. W. Wilson and Max C. Wilson, both of Burnsville, for appellant.
J. W. Ragland, of Marion, for appellees.
C. S. § 74 (Pub. Laws 1923, c. 55) , in part is as follows: "When the personal estate of a decedent is insufficient to pay all his debts, including the charges of administration, the executor, administrator or collector may, at any time after the grant of letters, apply to the superior court of the county where the land or some part thereof is situated, by petition, to sell the real property for the payment of the debts of such decedent, " etc.
Upon the death of a person owing debts, the land descends to the heirs at law, subject to the payment of the same, after exhausting the personal property. The heirs of the deceased are necessary parties to the proceeding. C. S. § 80 (Pub. Laws 1924, Ex. Sess. c. 3, § 1) .
It was contended by plaintiff Carrie Avery, guardian of the heirs at law of W. W. Avery, that defendants violated their timber contract with W. W. Avery; that defendants cut certain timber after W. W. Avery's death which was not included in the contract. The defendants set up an award under a consent order made June 21, 1930, in the present cause; Ira Vance, Sam G. Smith, and Vance Palmer being appointed to investigate and make an award, which was done.
The defendants contend that "settlement of this cause of action on the basis of $4.00 per M. feet, stumpage, for the amount of timber estimated and reported as aforesaid, which said offer these defendants accepted, and paid the said Vance accordingly, and took a release from him duly executed and for full value and before the filing of the complaint herein, which said release these defendants now plead in bar of the plaintiffs' action and right of recovery herein."
The release set up is as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Stewart v. Wall
...v. Wilson, 174 N.C. 636, 94 S.E. 416; Byrd v. Byrd, 117 N.C. 523, 23 S.E. 324; Tulburt v. Hollar, 102 N.C. 406, 9 S.E. 430; Avery v. Guy, 202 N.C. 152, 162 S.E. 217. We have above set forth a brief review of the major facts constituting the background of this suit. The testimony, while some......
- State v. Brown, 424.
- Wachovia Bank & Trust Co v. Turner