Avon Development Enterprises Corp. v. SAMNICK, ESQ.
| Decision Date | 06 September 2001 |
| Citation | 730 N.Y.S.2d 295,286 A.D.2d 581 |
| Parties | AVON DEVELOPMENT ENTERPRISES CORP. et al., Appellants,<BR>v.<BR>ROBERT L. SAMNICK, ESQ., Respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Wallach, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.
The motion court improperly denied plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment on the ground that plaintiffs could not establish that they would have been successful in the underlying action but for defendant attorney's failure to prepare an answer on their behalf. "To prevail in an action for legal malpractice, the plaintiff must show that the attorney was negligent and that `but for' the attorney's negligence the plaintiff would have prevailed in the underlying case." (Pacesetter Communications Corp. v Solin & Breindel, 150 AD2d 232, 233, lv dismissed 74 NY2d 892.) Here, there is no question that defendant was negligent. Even if plaintiffs did forward the complaint after they were already in default, there is no question that had defendant promptly determined at that point that service had been effected, he could have forestalled the entry of a default judgment and submitted an answer on plaintiffs' behalf. Further, the record reveals that plaintiffs would have prevailed as to some of their claims. Specifically, the underlying action was untimely as to the causes of action on the demand loans. The Statute of Limitations on a note payable on demand runs from the date the loan is made (Phoenix Acquisition Corp. v Campcore, Inc., 81 NY2d 138, 143; Environics, Inc. v Pratt, 50 AD2d 552). By the time the underlying action was commenced against plaintiffs, the six-year statute had run.
We further find that defendant may not rely on the doctrine of collateral estoppel to preclude litigation of this action. The doctrine does not apply to bar relitigation of a pure question of law (see, American Home Assur. Co. v International Ins. Co., 90 NY2d 433, 439; Matter of Department of Personnel v City Civ. Serv. Commn., 94 AD2d 5). Here, plaintiffs are at least entitled to relitigate the question of when a cause of action accrues for Statute of Limitations purposes on loans payable on demand. Further, collateral estoppel "is grounded on concepts of fairness and should not be rigidly or mechanically applied" (D'Arata v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 76 NY2d 659, 664). Thus, a former client should not be precluded from rearguing issues decided adversely to him or her because of the negligence of the client's attorney. By the very nature of...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Carl Follo, Follo Hospitality, Inc. v. Morency (In re Morency)
...2012 WL 5392139, at *3 (Del. Super. Nov. 2, 2012), aff'd, 69 A.3d 371 (Del. Super. Ct. 2013); Avon Dev. Enters. Corp. v. Samnick, 286 A.D.2d 581, 730 N.Y.S.2d 295 (2001), that courts have found the absence of a full and fair opportunity to litigate issues where the prior action involved att......
-
CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Ramirez
...the doctrine of collateral estoppel "does not apply to bar relitigation of a pure question of law" ( Avon Dev. Enters. Corp. v. Samnick, 286 A.D.2d 581, 582, 730 N.Y.S.2d 295 [2001] ; see American Home Assur. Co. v. International Ins. Co., 90 N.Y.2d 433, 440, 661 N.Y.S.2d 584, 684 N.E.2d 14......
-
State v. Philip Morris, Inc., No. (X02) CV 96-0148414S (CT 8/3/2005), (X02) CV 96-0148414S
...36 N.Y.2d 406, 411 (N.Y. 1979) ("[C]ollateral estoppel does not apply to an unmixed question of law."); and Avon Development Corp. v. Samnick, 730 N.Y.S.2d 295, 297 (N.Y.A.D. 2001) ("[D]efendant may not rely on the doctrine of collateral estoppel to preclude litigation of this action. The d......
-
Copyright.Net Music Pub. LLC v. MP3.Com, 01 Civ. 7321(JSR).
...(holding that collateral estoppel did not preclude malpractice claim against former attorney); Avon Dev. Enters. Corp. v. Samnick, 286 A.D.2d 581, 730 N.Y.S.2d 295 (1st Dep't 2001).1 Similarly precluded were defendant's assertions (and the affirmative defenses constructed thereon) that, bec......