Awad v. Severino
| Decision Date | 28 July 1986 |
| Citation | 122 A.D.2d 242,505 N.Y.S.2d 437 |
| Parties | Jamil AWAD, Respondent, v. Pericles SEVERINO, et al., Appellants. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
George E. Carmody, New York City, for appellants.
Silberzweig & Snitzken, Brooklyn (Neil Snitzken, of counsel), for respondent.
Before LAZER, J.P., and THOMPSON, LAWRENCE and EIBER, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In an action for specific performance of a contract to sell real estate, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pizzuto, J.), dated March 28, 1985, which denied their motion to vacate a judgment entered on default.
Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
We find no abuse of discretion in the court's denial of the defendants' motion to open their default and vacate the judgment which was entered against them. In order to obtain relief from a judgment or order pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(1) the defaulting party must show a reasonable excuse for the default. In this case, the purported excuse was that the defendants assumed the need to answer the summons and complaint had been "obviated" because they erroneously believed that the contract had been rescinded. This excuse, which essentially amounts to a claim of ignorance of the law, is insufficient, particularly in view of the fact that the defendants were represented by an attorney in connection with the real estate transaction. The defendants' erroneous assumption that there was no need to answer the complaint does not constitute a valid excuse for their default (see, generally, Amity Plumbing & Heating Supply Corp. v. Zito Plumbing & Heating Corp., 110 A.D.2d 863, 488 N.Y.S.2d 418; Passalacqua v. Banat, 103 A.D.2d 769, 477 N.Y.S.2d 398; Leone v. Johnson, 99 A.D.2d 567, 471 N.Y.S.2d 393; Whitaker v. McGee, 95 A.D.2d 938, 464 N.Y.S.2d 276; cf. Fire Is. Pines v. Colonial Dormer Corp., 109 A.D.2d 815, 486 N.Y.S.2d 334).
The defendants' other contentions are without merit.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP v. Maurer
...77 AD3d 822, 910 N.Y.S.2d 104 [2d Dept 2010]; Dorrer v. Berry, 37 AD3d 519, 830 N.Y.S.2d 277 [2d Dept 2007]; Awad v. Severino, 122 A.D.2d 242, 505 N.Y.S.2d 437 [2d Dept.1986] ). It has also been held that where statutorily mandated special notices, expressly warning of the gravity of the su......
-
Yao Ping Tang v. Grand EState, LLC
...Yogurt v. Toscano, 232 A.D.2d 604, 606, 649 N.Y.S.2d 163; Moore v. Claudio, 224 A.D.2d 502, 503, 637 N.Y.S.2d 489; Awad v. Severino, 122 A.D.2d 242, 505 N.Y.S.2d 437). In addition, the appellants failed to present a potentially meritorious defense to the action ( see Fekete v. Camp Skwere, ......
-
JP Morgan Chase Bank v. Palma
...v. Grand Estate, LLC, 77 A.D.3d 822, 823, 910 N.Y.S.2d 104; Dorrer v. Berry, 37 A.D.3d 519, 520, 830 N.Y.S.2d 277; Awad v. Severino, 122 A.D.2d 242, 242, 505 N.Y.S.2d 437). Since the appellant failed to offer a reasonable excuse, it is unnecessary to consider whether she sufficiently demons......
-
Immigration Servs. for New Americans v. Monchas
...82 A.D.3d 1041, 1042, 919 N.Y.S.2d 358 ; Yao Ping Tang v. Grand Estate, LLC, 77 A.D.3d 822, 823, 910 N.Y.S.2d 104 ; Awad v. Severino, 122 A.D.2d 242, 505 N.Y.S.2d 437 ; Passalacqua v. Banat, 103 A.D.2d 769, 477 N.Y.S.2d 398 ). As the defendants failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for ......