Ayling v. Kramer
Decision Date | 13 May 1882 |
Citation | 133 Mass. 12 |
Parties | Isaac Ayling v. Mary Kramer |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Suffolk.
Exceptions overruled.
J. A Maxwell, for the defendant.
S. W Creech, Jr., for the plaintiff.
This is an action to recover damages for a breach of the covenant against incumbrances, contained in a deed from the defendant to the plaintiff.
The city of Boston, by its deed dated July 3, 1862, conveyed the land in question to Mary Ann Carter. This deed, after the description and before the habendum, contained the provision that The land by mesne conveyances came to the defendant, who conveyed it to the plaintiff by a deed containing the usual covenants.
We are of opinion that the so-called conditions in the deed to Carter were not intended or understood by the parties to be technical conditions, a breach of which would work a forfeiture of the estate. They were intended to regulate the mode in which the grantee might use and enjoy the land, and are to be construed as restrictions. Episcopal City Mission v. Appleton, 117 Mass. 326. Skinner v. Shepard, 130 Mass. 180. This same deed was before this court for construction in Keening v. Ayling, 126 Mass. 404; and although the question is not discussed in the opinion, that case...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Clapp v. Wilder
...especially if one of them be of such a nature as to be regarded as a personal stipulation. Skinner v. Shepard, 130 Mass. 180; Ayling v. Kramer, 133 Mass. 12. So, also, a reciting that the premises are conveyed subject to a condition contained in a prior deed, and reciting the condition, may......
-
Mickleson v. Gypsy Oil Co.
...Appleton, 117 Mass. 326, cited with approval by the Supreme Court of Oklahoma in Fraley v. Wilkinson, 79 Okl. 21, 191 P. 156; Ayling v. Kramer, 133 Mass. 12; Los Angeles University v. Swarth, 107 F. 798, 46 C. A. 647, 54 L. R. A. 262; Scoville v. McMahon, 62 Conn. 378, 26 A. 479, 21 L. R. A......
-
Weiser v. Freeman
... ... Repr. 1027); Post v. Weil, 115 N.Y. 361 (22 N.E ... Repr. 145); Meigs v. Lewis, 164 Pa. 597; Landell ... v. Hamilton, 175 Pa. 327; Ayling v. Kramer, 133 ... Mass. 12; Watrous v. Allen, 57 Mich. 362 (24 N.W. 104) ... In ... Pennsylvania, where a building restriction is ... ...
-
Mickleson v. Gypsy Oil Co.
...Appleton, 117 Mass. 326, cited with approval by the Supreme Court of Oklahoma in Fraley v. Wilkinson, 79 Okla. 21, 191 P. 156; Ayling v. Kramer, 133 Mass. 12; Los Angeles University v. Swarth, 107 F. 798; Scovill v. McMahon, 62 Conn. 378, 36 Am. St. Rep. 360, 26 A. 479; Post v. Weil, 115 N.......