B.P., In Interest of
Decision Date | 04 February 1993 |
Docket Number | No. A92A2077,A92A2077 |
Citation | 427 S.E.2d 593,207 Ga.App. 242 |
Parties | In the Interest of B.P., et al., children. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Robert P. Crossett, Marietta, for appellant.
Michael J. Bowers, Atty. Gen., Margot M. Cairnes, Atlanta, Staff Atty., Douglas D. Middleton, James K. Knight, Jr., and Edwards, Friedewald & Grayson, Robert J. Grayson, Marietta, for appellee.
Appellant brings this appeal from an order of the Juvenile Court of Cobb County terminating her parental rights with respect to her two sons, B.P. and R.P. The juvenile court also terminated the parental rights of the children's fathers, but no appeal has been taken by either father from that portion of the juvenile court's order. In her sole enumeration of error on appeal, the mother contends the juvenile court's order was not authorized by the evidence presented during the hearing on the termination petition.
B.P. and R.P. were born March 8, 1989 and March 5, 1988 and were two and three years of age, respectively, at the time of the termination proceedings. The record shows the Department of Family & Children Services (DFACS) first became involved with the family in September 1989 and that the children were removed from the home in February 1990. The record further shows that while the children were in appellant's care her boyfriend, who lived in the home with appellant and the children, severely physically abused the children and appellant, who testified she was unaware of the abuse, and did nothing to protect her children from the abuse. Testimony was also presented that appellant failed to get prompt medical care for the children's injuries although she should have been aware they were in need of such care, and that she continued to live with the boyfriend after the children were removed from her custody because of the abuse. In March 1990, the juvenile court entered an order, which has never been appealed, finding the children to be deprived. The children were placed in the care of foster parents, and according to testimony presented at the hearing, they have made remarkable physical and emotional improvement during that time.
In December 1990, appellant entered a plea of guilty but mentally retarded to charges of child cruelty and was sentenced to prison. Appellant was released from prison approximately one month prior to the termination hearing. Evidence was presented that the children have no bond with appellant, that during two visits with their mother while she was incarcerated the children treated her as a stranger, and that R.P. had "acted out" for two days after being told he was going to visit his mother. Testimony was also presented that both children had developed a parent-child relationship with their foster parents, who desired to adopt the children.
Although acknowledging her shortcomings as a parent, appellant testified she loved her children. Appellant further testified she had taken some courses in prison to help her learn to care for her children, that upon release from prison she found a job in a sock factory, and that her goal was to become self-sufficient (i.e., get her own apartment and car) and eventually regain custody of her children. She admits the children have not bonded with her, but asserts she has not been provided sufficient opportunity to visit with her children although she requested visitation on several occasions while she was incarcerated.
In the Interest of B.J.H., 194 Ga.App. 282, 390 S.E.2d 427 (1990). In re B.D.C., 256 Ga. 511, 513, 350 S.E.2d 444 (1986).
As to the first criterion, no appeal was taken from the order of the juvenile court entered in March 1990 finding the children to be deprived and thus appellant is bound by that determination. See In the Interest of J.L.Y., 184 Ga.App. 254(1), 361 S.E.2d 246...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
IN RE MLP, A99A0105.
...should defer to the lower court as the trier of fact unless the clear and convincing standard is not met. Id.; In the Interest of B.P., 207 Ga.App. 242, 244, 427 S.E.2d 593 (1993). Viewed in this light, the evidence showed that M.L.P. was born in January 1991 and her half-sister, M.D.P., wa......
-
IN RE JB, A01A0679.
...unless the appellate standard is not met." In the Interest of R.N., 224 Ga.App. 202, 480 S.E.2d 243 (1997); In the Interest of B.P., 207 Ga.App. 242, 244, 427 S.E.2d 593 (1993). Viewed in this light, the evidence showed that J.B. was born in November 1992 and that the child is currently in ......
-
IN RE VMT
...405 S.E.2d 750 (1991). 17. In the Interest of K.R.C., 235 Ga.App. 354, 355(1), 510 S.E.2d 547 (1998). 18. In the Interest of B.P., 207 Ga.App. 242, 245, 427 S.E.2d 593 (1993). 19. See In the Interest of R.M., 232 Ga.App. 727, 729, 503 S.E.2d 635 ...
-
S.L.B., In Interest of
...unless the appellate standard of review ... is not met.' In re B.D.C., 256 Ga. 511, 513 (350 SE2d 444) (1986)." In the Interest of B.P., 207 Ga.App. 242, 244, 427 S.E.2d 593. In this connection, we note that while appellant points out a number of conflicts in the evidence, such conflicts do......