A.B. v. C.
| Decision Date | 20 June 1984 |
| Citation | 124 Misc.2d 672,477 N.Y.S.2d 281 |
| Parties | A.B., an Adult Woman, Plaintiff, v. C., a Hospital; D.E., a Doctor; and F.G., the Adult Husband of Plaintiff, Defendants. * Supreme Court, Schenectady County |
| Court | New York Supreme Court |
Although the caption on the front sheet of the order to show cause designates the parties as plaintiff and defendants, the balance of the papers would indicate that the proper designation should be petitioner and respondents and that this matter is in the nature of some kind of special proceeding. The affidavit of petitioner contains no caption, and the affidavit of petitioner's attorney designates the matter as "In an Application to Establish the Competency of A.B."
The papers indicate that petitioner seeks a determination pursuant to the equitable powers of this Court to determine that she is competent and to allow her to determine her own future medical care. The papers seek an order determining that she is competent to determine her own medical needs; an order to allow her to refuse additional medical care, treatment and nourishment; and an order directing defendants to comply with the stated and written desires of petitioner not to have any further medical care other than pain relief medication. Finally, the papers seek an order directing defendants to comply with the wishes of petitioner in the event she should become unable to further communicate her desires.
This proceeding was commenced by an order to show cause which allowed service upon defendants through their attorneys. The attorneys have, except for attorney Gold, appeared and accepted personal jurisdiction on behalf of their clients. It was indicated that attorney Gold will also waive any problem of personal jurisdiction.
The affidavit of petitioner, who is 54 years old with a family history of extreme longevity, recounts that, at all times prior to April 11, 1982, she was a healthy and an active woman. She has a loving husband, with whom she has raised five children. Three of the children are married, one is in college, and the youngest is 14 years of age and resides at home. On April 11, 1982, petitioner slipped and fell, suffering a fracture dislocation of the vertebrae in her neck. As a result, she became totally quadriplegic. She is unable to move her hands and feet or her arms and legs. She is unable to toilet for herself. She is unable to feed herself. She is unable to breathe for herself. She will be, for the rest of her life, confined to a bed or a wheelchair which contains a ventilator pumping air into her lungs through an opening in her trachea. The only time she can talk is between breathing cycles of the ventilator. She characterizes her state as a "living hell." She states that she has, on numerous occasions, attempted to terminate her life by moving her head to whatever extent possible and thereby dislodging her breathing tubes. However, on those occasions, an alarm has sounded and the nurses have responded to prevent her death. An affidavit attached to the papers by a board-certified psychiatrist concludes that she is rational, sane and competent, even with regard to her intent to refuse medical treatment in the future.
Petitioner is concerned that, in the future, when she goes into the hospital, as she often has to because of infections, she will be in such a state that she will not be able to communicate her true feelings concerning her treatment. It is her desire that she not be given any additional medical treatment but rather that nature be allowed to take its course. She wants to take only whatever nourishment she chooses, even to the extent of taking none at all. She is not asking that the life support equipment be disconnected but simply that she be given no more medical treatment and only such nourishment as she desires. She does wish to take pain medication, if needed. Defendant D.E., her doctor, has advised petitioner that his moral ethics would dictate that, if she were to come into the hospital under his care, he would of necessity be required to provide her with continuing life-saving medical treatment. She respects his feelings and acknowledges the outstanding job he has done to care for her. However, she has formally discharged him because of those feelings.
The Court concludes that it cannot grant the relief requested. The Court is sympathetic with petitioner's plight and would honor her request if it arose within the context of an actual and real controversy.
As a general rule, every human being of adult years and sound mind has the right to determine what should be done with his or her body and cannot be subjected to medical treatment without his or...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Cruzan by Cruzan v. Harmon
...(1981), In the Matter of Lydia E. Hall Hospital v. Cinque, 116 Misc.2d 477, 455 N.Y.S.2d 706 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1982), A.B. v. C., 124 Misc.2d 672, 477 N.Y.S.2d 281 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1984), Crouse Irving Memorial Hospital v. Paddock, 127 Misc.2d 101, 485 N.Y.S.2d 443 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1985),In the Matter of S......
-
Fiori, In re
...In the Matter of Lydia E. Hall Hospital v. Cinque, 116 Misc.2d 477, 455 N.Y.S.2d 706 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1982); A.B. v. C., 124 Misc.2d 672, 477 N.Y.S.2d 281 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1984); Crouse Irving Memorial Hosp. v. Paddock, 127 Misc.2d 101, 485 N.Y.S.2d 443 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1985); In the Matter of Saunders, 1......
-
Saunders v. State
...past, is not a sufficient basis on which to deny the application out of hand on technical grounds despite the holding in A.B. v. C., 124 Misc.2d 672, 477 N.Y.S.2d 281. The court finds that even at the present time a substantial controversial issue exists with respect to the applicant's futu......
-
Winthrop University Hosp., Application of
...sub nom. Storar, by Hughes, Guardian Ad Litem v. Storar, 454 U.S. 858, 102 S.Ct. 309, 70 L.Ed.2d 153 (1981); see also, A.B. v. C., 124 Misc.2d 672, 477 N.Y.S.2d 281 (1984)). However, whether a competent adult patient's religious right must yield to the State's interest in acting as parens p......