Bader v. Beck
Decision Date | 31 August 1939 |
Docket Number | No. 6025.,6025. |
Citation | 173 S.W.2d 647 |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Parties | BADER v. BECK. |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Pemiscot County; Louis H. Schult, Judge.
"Not to be published in State Reports."
Action by J. W. Bader against R. M. Beck for plaintiff's agreed share of commissions earned by defendant on sales of realty. From a judgment of dismissal, plaintiff appeals.
Affirmed.
C. G. Shepard, of Caruthersville, for appellant.
Ward & Reeves, of Caruthersville, for respondent.
On January 18, 1938, plaintiff filed his original petition in this cause, secured a writ of attachment in aid thereof, and had garnishment summons served on George R. Crockett and Cecil Sayre. On April 18, 1938, defendant filed his amended answer and thereafter on the same date and the day before the cause was set for trial plaintiff filed his amended petition. Thereupon defendant filed his motion to strike the amended petition for the reason that it was not timely filed and for the further reason that it was not an amendment of plaintiff's original cause of action, but the substitution of a new and different cause of action. The trial court took the motion under advisement, and on August 8, 1938, sustained same. Upon plaintiff's refusal to plead further, and electing to stand on his amended petition, it was ordered by the court that plaintiff take nothing by his writ; that his cause of action be dismissed; and that defendant recover of plaintiff his cost. From this order and judgment plaintiff has appealed.
Omitting formal parts, the original petition is as follows:
The cause of action as stated in the amended petition, in which George R. Crockett and Cecil Sayre are added as defendants, is as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Grue v. Hensley
...the estate for reimbursement of amounts paid to satisfy debts of decedent. Jacobs v. Chicago, P. & St. L.R. Co., 204 S.W. 954; Bader v. Beck, 173 S.W.2d 647; Brinkmann Realty Co. v. Deidesheimer, 201 503; Garland v. Smith, 64 S.W. 188; 34 C.J., sec. 1226. (2) Where two demands against an es......
-
State ex rel. Duggan v. Kirkwood
...reviewed by this court unless the inferior court has palpably, prejudicially, clearly and unmistakably abused its discretion. Bader v. Beck, 173 S.W.2d 647; Commonwealth Finance Corp. v. Mo. Motor Bus Co., S.W. 756; Sartin v. Springfield Hospital Assn., 195 S.W. 1038; White v. Boyne, 224 Mo......
-
White v. Sievers
...v. Glasner, 79 Mo. 449; State ex rel. v. Cook, 353 Mo. 272, 182 S.W.2d 292; Neville v. D'Oench, 327 Mo. 34, 34 S.W.2d 491; Bader v. Beck, 173 S.W.2d 647; Mineral Belt v. Elking Lead & Zinc Co., 158 S.W. 1066; Ross v. Cleveland and A. Mineral Land Co., 162 Mo. 317, 62 S.W. 984; Heman v. Glan......
-
Weller v. Hayes Truck Lines
...to state, a cause of action on contract, cannot be amended so as to state or attempt to state a cause of action for fraud. Bader v. Beek, 173 S.W.2d 647. (8) Appellant's motion to make the amended petition definite and certain should have been sustained. The use of the descriptive terms "to......