Baer v. Moran Bros Co
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | BREWER |
| Citation | Baer v. Moran Bros Co, 153 U.S. 287, 14 S.Ct. 823, 38 L.Ed. 718 (1894) |
| Decision Date | 30 April 1894 |
| Docket Number | No. 683,683 |
| Parties | BAER v. MORAN BROS. CO |
T. H. N. McPherson, John H. Mitchell, and M. L. Baer, for plaintiff in error.
Joseph H. Parsons, W. C. Jones, Atty. Gen., John P. Fay, S. F. Phillips, and Frederick D. McKenney, filed briefs in behalf of interested parties by leave of court.
This case comes before us on error to the supreme court of Washington. 27 Pac. 470. The questions are mainly similar to those in the case of Mann v. Land Co. (just decided) 14 Sup. Ct. 820.
The plaintiff described the land in his complaint as 'at the time of its selection by said plaintiff unoccupied and unappropriated public land of the United States not mineral, in this, that the said tract of land was situated in the territory of Washington, was a portion of the tide flats, covered and uncovered by the ebb and flow of the tide, was uncovered at ordinary low tide, and was covered with water at ordinary high tide, and had never been set apart by the United States for any particular use.' This shows that the land at the time of its entry was, strictly speaking, tide lands, and, with this as the sole description, there would be nothing to distinguish the case from the one just decided. There is, however, this further description: 'Beginning at a point 688 feet south and 660 feet west of the east one-fourth post of Sec. 6, Tp. 24 N., R. 4 E., W. M., thence west 150 feet, thence south 210 feet, thence east 150 feet, thence north 210 feet to place of beginning, being the premises covered by Moran Brothers Company's foundry and machine shops.'
Upon this, plaintiff contends that the premises are not to be taken as a part of the shore or tide lands bordering on navigable water, inasmuch as they are shown...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
State v. City of Tampa
... ... tide lands, see Mann v. Tacoma Land Co., 153 U.S ... 273, 14 S.Ct. 820, 38 L.Ed. 714; Baer v. Moran Bros ... Co., 153 U.S. 287, 14 S.Ct. 823, 38 L.Ed. 718. See, ... also, Port of ... ...
- State v. Byles
- Wrought Iron Range Co. v. Campen
- King Cnty. v. Abernathy
-
§ 12.2 - Lands Managed by the Department of Natural Resources
...608, 614-15, 27 P. 470(1891) (discussing, in dicta, a salt marsh in front of Mare Island in California as an "overflowed land"), aff'd, 153 U.S. 287, 14 S. Ct. 823, L. Ed. 718 (1894). Fourteen states (including Oregon and California, but mostly along the Mississippi River) received swamp an......
-
Table of Cases
...21 U.S. (8 Wheat.) 1, 5 L. Ed. 547 (1823): 6.3(2), 6.3(3)(b) Hardin v. Jordan, 140 U.S. 371, 11 S. Ct. 808, 35 L. Ed. 428 (1891)), aff'd, 153 U.S. 287, 14 S. Ct. 823, 38 L. Ed. 718 (1894): 18.1, 18.4(1), 18.7(1) Hinderlider v. La Plata River & Cherry Creek Ditch Co., 304 U.S. 92, 58 S. Ct. ......
-
Table of Cases
...Cnty. Fire Dist. No. 6, 144 Wn.2d 774, 30 P.3d 1261 (2001): 17.4(1)(b) Baer v. Moran Bros. Co., 2 Wash. 608, 27 P. 470 (1891), aff'd, 153 U.S. 287, 14 S. Ct. 823, 38 L. Ed. 718 (1894): 12.2(5)(a)(i), 12.2(5)(c)(i), 12.2(5)(c)(i) Baker v. Tri-Mountain Res., Inc., 94 Wn. App. 849, 973 P.2d 10......
-
§ 18.1 - Introduction
...Bros. Co., 2 Wash. 608, 613, 27 P. 470 (1891) (quoting Hardin v. Jordan, 140 U.S. 371, 381, 11 S. Ct. 808, 35 L. Ed. 428 (1891)), aff'd, 153 U.S. 287, 14 S. Ct. 823, 38 L. Ed. 718 These three quotes excellently illustrate the competing forces at play in Washington law since statehood regard......
