Baggett v. State, 72--736

Decision Date04 January 1974
Docket NumberNo. 72--736,72--736
Citation287 So.2d 336
PartiesMichael A. BAGGETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

James A. Gardner, Public Defender, and Elliott C. Metcalfe, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard C. Booth, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

HOBSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted, adjudged guilty, and sentenced to seven years imprisonment on a charge of breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony, and to five years on a charge of grand larceny, to run consecutively.

Upon a review of the briefs and record on appeal, we are of the opinion that the evidence was sufficient to sustain a conviction.

Although not raised on appeal, we conclude that in light of the facts and circumstances of this case the trial court erred in imposing upon appellant two separate sentences on two crimes which were facets of the same transaction, since the only valid sentence that could have been entered was for the highest offense. Cone v. State, Fla.1973, 285 So.2d 12.

The case is remanded for the purpose of vacating the sentence as to grand larceny and resentencing appellant on the judgment for breaking and entering.

Remanded with directions.

MANN, C.J., and GRIMES, J., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Estevez v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • February 26, 1975
    ...277 So.2d 300 (Fla.App.1973), Edmond v. State, 280 So.2d 449 (Fla.App.1973), cert. denied 287 So.2d 690 (Fla.1973), and Baggett v. State, 287 So.2d 336 (Fla.App.1974). Petitioner was informed against, tried and convicted of the crime of breaking and entering a dwelling with intent to commit......
  • Hardrick v. State, 73--32
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • April 19, 1974
    ...precludes the additional imposition of a maximum sentence for grand larceny shown as proof of felonious intent. See also Baggett v. State, Fla.App.2d 1974, 287 So.2d 336; Gelis v. State, Fla.App.2d 1973, 287 So.2d 368; Nettles v. State, Fla.App.2d 1974, 293 So.2d Accordingly, this cause is ......
  • Baggett v. State, 74--323
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 4, 1974
    ...point on constitutional grounds, if necessary, but for the moment the common sense of the situation seems to suffice. 1 Baggett v. State (Fla.App.2d 1974), 287 So.2d 336.2 (Fla.1973), 285 So.2d 12.3 In retrospect, the Cone case, Supra, may have been the wrong authority upon which to rely si......
  • Baggett v. State, 44932
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • April 30, 1974
    ...Michael A. BAGGETT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent. No. 44932. Supreme Court of Florida. April 30, 1974. Certiorari denied. 287 So.2d 336. ROBERTS, Acting C.J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT