Bailey v. Bailey
| Decision Date | 23 September 1982 |
| Docket Number | No. 38924,38924 |
| Citation | 295 S.E.2d 304,250 Ga. 15 |
| Parties | Sherri Felicia BAILEY v. John Allen BAILEY. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Jerry Cadle, Swainsboro, for John Allen Bailey.
J. Franklin Edenfield, Spivey, Carlton & Edenfield, P. C., Swainsboro, for Sherri Felicia Bailey.
The parties were granted a divorce. The only issue which remained was appellant's prayer for equitable division of the following property: (1) a 1979 Pontiac Grand Prix, titled in appellee's mother's name, which the mother gave to appellee for his use prior to the parties' marriage; (2) the parties' marital residence, purchased by appellee's mother with the proceeds of a life insurance policy on appellee's deceased father, which is titled in appellee's name only, and which the mother intended to give to appellee alone.
The trial judge granted the husband summary judgment because he concluded that the above items were "separate property" under Code Ann. § 53-502 rather than "marital property" and, therefore, not subject to equitable property division as a matter of law. See Moore v. Moore, 249 Ga. 27, 287 S.E.2d 185 (1982); Stokes v. Stokes, 246 Ga. 765, 273 S.E.2d 169 (1980). Appellant argues that the trial judge erred in granting summary judgment. We affirm.
(1) This case does not involve awards of alimony, only the equitable division of the property set forth above.
We are not concerned here with identifying the precise ownership interests in the automobile in this case. It is clear that whatever interest these parties had in the car was not acquired during the marriage. Because that property interest was brought into the marriage by appellee, it is not subject to equitable property division. Moore v. Moore, 249 Ga. 27(2), 287 S.E.2d 185 (1982).
It is equally clear that appellant may claim no equitable interest in the marital residence at issue here. Neither party made any contributions towards the acquisition of this property. It was given to appellee alone during the time of the marriage. We now hold that property acquired during the marriage by either party by gift, inheritance, bequest or devise remains the separate property of the party that acquired it, and is not subject to equitable division. See, Stokes v. Stokes, 246 Ga. 765, 273 S.E.2d 169 (concurring opinion of Hill, J.) (1980).
Because there was no conflict in the evidence presented to the trial judge on these questions, he properly granted summary...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Brown v. Little
...division of property upon the dissolution of the marriage. See Yates v. Yates, 259 Ga. 131, 377 S.E.2d 677 (1989); Bailey v. Bailey, 250 Ga. 15, 295 S.E.2d 304 (1982); Moore v. Moore, 249 Ga. 27, 287 S.E.2d 185 (1982); Stokes v. Stokes, 246 Ga. 765, 768, 273 S.E.2d 169 (1980), and cases cit......
-
Mortensen v. Mortensen
...thereby acquiring an equitable interest in the property. In some states, this rule is aided by or based on statute. Bailey v. Bailey, 250 Ga. 15, 295 S.E.2d 304 (1982); Klingberg v. Klingberg, 68 Ill.App.3d 513, 25 Ill.Dec. 246, 386 N.E.2d 517 (1979); In re Marriage of Pitluck, 616 S.W.2d 8......
-
Hussey v. Hussey
...as a consequence of their mutual efforts owes nothing to the marriage and is not intended to be shared. See, e.g., Bailey v. Bailey, 250 Ga. 15, 295 S.E.2d 304 (1982). Third, our Supreme Court, relying on special equity principles, has established certain parameters within which spousal pro......
-
Rooks v. Rooks
...correct verdict in this case." The court did not instruct the jury as to the principles set out in our recent case of Bailey v. Bailey, 250 Ga. 15, 295 S.E.2d 304 (1982), amplifying Stokes v. Stokes, 246 Ga. 765, 273 S.E.2d 169 (1980), which established the following proposition: "[P]ropert......
-
§ 3.03 Equitable Distribution Systems
...Code § 31-15-7-5). New Hampshire: In re Henry, 163 N.H. 175, 37 A.3d 320 (2012). [37] See § 13.04 infra.[38] See, e.g.: Bailey v. Bailey, 295 S.E.2d 304 (Ga. 1982); Moore v. Moore, 287 S.E.2d 185 (Ga. 1982).[39] Colorado: Colo. Rev. Stat. § 14-10-113. Delaware: 13 Del. Code Ann. § 13-3-1513......
-
Are We Witnessing the Erosion of Georgia's Separate Property Distinction?
...377 S.E.2d 677, 678 (1989) (quoting Moore v. Moore, 249 Ga. 27, 28, 287 S.E.2d 185, 186 (1982)) (emphasis added). 16. Bailey v. Bailey, 250 Ga. 15, 15, 295 S.E.2d 304, 304 (1982) (emphasis added). 17. 278 Ga. 49, 597 S.E.2d 359 (2004). 18. Id. at 49, 597 S.E.2d at 360-61 (citations omitted)......
-
§ 6.03 Inherited Property
...California: Cal. Fam. Code § 770. Delaware: 13 Del. Code Ann. § 1513. Florida: Fla. Stat. Ann. § 61.075. Georgia: Bailey v. Bailey, 250 Ga. 15, 295 S.E.2d 304 (1982). Iowa: Marriage of Geil, 509 N.W.2d 738 (Iowa 1993). Kentucky: Ky. Rev. Stat. § 403.190. Maine: Me. Rev. Stat. § 952(2). Miss......