Bailey v. Bailey, II-383

Decision Date20 July 1978
Docket NumberNo. II-383,II-383
Citation361 So.2d 204
PartiesMary Toole BAILEY, Appellant, v. Oswald Samuel BAILEY, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

M. Stephen Turner and Joseph P. Mawhinney of Thompson, Wadsworth, Messer, Turner & Rhodes, Tallahassee, and Carroll L. McCauley, Panama City, for appellant.

Robert B. Staats, Panama City, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant/wife contends on this appeal that the trial court erred in awarding the custody of the parties' minor son to the appellee/husband. After careful consideration of the transcript, the briefs, and the oral argument, we have found no abuse of discretion in the trial court's judgment that the best interests of the child would be served by this award.

We do find merit, however, in the point raised by husband on cross-appeal. He contends that the trial court erred in limiting his use and possession of the marital home to a period of approximately one year. We agree that he as the custodial parent should have the use and possession of the home until the child's majority or his remarriage. See McNaughton v. McNaughton, 332 So.2d 673 (Fla.3d D.C.A.1976).

The judgment is affirmed in part and reversed in part, and the case remanded for the entry of a judgment consistent with this opinion.

McCORD, C. J., and MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Smith v. Smith, 79-546
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 20 Noviembre 1979
    ...to occupy the residence with the children until she remarries or the youngest attains majority. As was stated in Bailey v. Bailey, 361 So.2d 204, 205 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978): We do find merit, however, in the point raised by husband on cross-appeal. He contends that the trial court erred in lim......
  • Cabrera v. Cabrera, 85-1024
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 11 Marzo 1986
    ...So.2d 11 (Fla.3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 388 So.2d 1118 (Fla.1980); Dolch v. Dolch, 368 So.2d 618 (Fla.2d DCA 1979); Bailey v. Bailey, 361 So.2d 204 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Singer v. Singer, 342 So.2d 861 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); Reisman v. Reisman, 314 So.2d 783 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), cert. denied,......
  • Lambert v. Lambert
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 13 Agosto 1981
    ...a dissolution decree terminates upon that spouse's remarriage. Strollo v. Strollo, 365 So.2d 189 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Bailey v. Bailey, 361 So.2d 204 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Singer v. Singer, 342 So.2d 861 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); Jones v. Jones, 330 So.2d 536 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); Abella-Fernandez......
  • Boykin v. Boykin, 54588
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 8 Febrero 1984
    ...806 (Fla.App.1980); McDonald v. McDonald, 368 So.2d 1283 (Fla.1979); Alford v. Alford, 364 So.2d 1255 (Fla.App.1978); Bailey v. Bailey, 361 So.2d 204 (Fla.App.1978); and Cobb v. Cobb, 352 So.2d 1384 (Ala.Civ.App.1977). We construe these cases, at least insofar as they have any application i......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT