Bailie Communications, Ltd. v. Trend Business Systems, Inc.

Decision Date01 January 1991
Citation61 Wn.App. 151,810 P.2d 12
CourtWashington Court of Appeals
NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION

To continue reading

Request your trial
93 cases
  • City of Seattle v. Monsanto Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Washington
    • 3 Mayo 2019
    ...and justice require it." Young v. Young, 164 Wash. 2d 477, 484, 191 P.3d 1258 (2008) (citing Bailie Commc'ns, Ltd. v. Trend Bus. Sys., Inc., 61 Wash. App. 151, 160, 810 P.2d 12 (1991) ). There are three elements: "[1] a benefit conferred upon the defendant by the plaintiff, [2] an appreciat......
  • Young v. Young
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • 11 Septiembre 2008
    ...absent any contractual relationship because notions of fairness and justice require it. See Bailie Commc'ns, Ltd. v. Trend Bus. Sys., Inc., 61 Wash.App. 151, 160, 810 P.2d 12 (1991) ("Unjust enrichment occurs when one retains money or benefits which in justice and equity belong to ¶ 16 In s......
  • Rekhter v. State
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • 3 Abril 2014
    ...suggest that an unjust enrichment claim depends upon the absence of any contractual relationship. See Bailie Commc'ns, Ltd. v. Trend Bus. Sys., Inc., 61 Wash.App. 151, 810 P.2d 12 (1991). Moreover, the “absent any contractual relationship” language in Young seems at odds with what we have s......
  • Washington Constr. Inc. v. Sterling Sav. Bank
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • 13 Septiembre 2011
    ...783, 830, 185 P.3d 594 (2008); Alvarado v. Microsoft Corp., 2010 WL 715455, *4 (W.D. Wash. 2010) (citing Bailie Commc'n, Ltd. v. Trend Bus. Sys. Inc., 61 Wn. App. 151, 160, 810 P.2d 12, 814 P.2d 699, review denied, 117 Wn.2d 1029 (1991)). "A person confers a 'benefit' upon another if he per......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Full Compensation, Not Overcompensation: Rethinking Prejudgment Interest Offsets in Washington
    • United States
    • Seattle University School of Law Seattle University Law Review No. 30-03, March 2007
    • Invalid date
    ...prejudgment interest is governed by case law, not statute."); Bailie Commc'ns, Inc. v. Trend Bus. Sys., Inc., 61 Wash. App. 151, 161-62, 810 P.2d 12, 19 (1991) (while interest on a judgment is allowed by statute, prejudgment interest is allowed by state 91. Mall Tool Co. v. Far W. Equip. Co......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT