Baker v. Baker, 21484
| Decision Date | 09 June 1981 |
| Docket Number | No. 21484,21484 |
| Citation | 279 S.E.2d 601,276 S.C. 427 |
| Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | Martha H. BAKER, Respondent, v. Gordon Badger BAKER, Jr., Appellant. and Gordon Badger BAKER, Jr., Appellant, v. Martha H. BAKER, Respondent. |
Willcox, Hardee, O'Farrell, McLeod, Buyck & Baker and Allen C. Pate, Florence, for appellant.
Kermit S. King, Columbia, for respondent.
Gordon Badger Baker, Jr., (husband) and Martha H. Baker (wife) were granted a divorce on the grounds of three years continuous separation. The trial judge awarded the wife (1) alimony, (2) custody of the one child and child support, (3) an equitable division of the marital property, and (4) attorney's fees. The husband appeals each area of the award except child custody and support. Subsequent to the divorce, the wife remarried, thereby rendering moot on appeal the issue of alimony.
Between their marriage in June, 1968 and separation in 1975, the wife taught school, receiving roughly $6,000 to $6,500 annually. She and her husband maintained separate bank accounts until 1971, at which time they opened a joint checking account. She also contributed to the savings account under his name only. While her husband was in the military in Vietnam between August 1968 and his return in 1971, she mailed him $100 per month, thereby allowing him to save his $700-$900 per month army salary.
Upon returning from Vietnam, the husband was reemployed by his former law firm. His average income as attorney between 1971 and 1975 was about $20,000 per year. He realized additional income from stocks in his name, the bulk of which were acquired prior to marriage.
The trial judge determined that the parties accumulated the following marital property:
(1) a residence with an existing fair market value of $50,000 with an outstanding mortgage debt of $20,000 as of the time of the hearing;
(2) stocks;
(3) a savings account totaling $10,000; and
(4) personal assets of the husband.
He found that the wife was equitably entitled to complete ownership of the home, free of the mortgage lien, and that the husband could retain the remainder of the accumulated marital property. He ordered the husband to satisfy the mortgage debt.
The right of a wife to claim a special equitable interest in property accumulated during marriage is based upon her showing that she has materially contributed through finances or personal services to the husband's business or acquisition of property. Wilson v. Wilson, 270 S.C. 216, 241 S.E.2d 566 (1978). The wife here contributed expense money to the husband while he served in Vietnam, worked steadily as a teacher until giving birth to their child, and has generally attended to her normal household duties. The husband would have the equitable division determined by a strict mathematical approach comparing the parties' respective incomes. We reject this approach and refer to the language in Wilson v. Wilson, supra, wherein we said, "The relative incomes and material contributions of (the parties) must be weighed." (Emphasis added.) At the same time, this "special equity" should be warranted only where there exist special facts and circumstances in favor of one party above and beyond normal marital obligations.
Arrington v. Arrington, 150 So.2d 473, (Fla. 3d D.C.A. 1963), cert. den., 155 So.2d 615 (Fla.1963).
This action being a matter in equity heard by a single judge, we are entitled to find the facts based upon our view of the preponderance of the evidence. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of Greenville, 266 S.C. 81, 221 S.E.2d 773 (1976). The husband conceded that while in Vietnam, the monthly...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Smith v. Smith
...Divorce in South Carolina: An Exploration and Recommendation, 33 S.C.L.Rev. 227, 241-48 (1981), citing, inter alia, Baker v. Baker, 276 S.C. 427, 279 S.E.2d 601 (1981); Stone v. Stone, 274 S.C. 571, 266 S.E.2d 70 (1980); Taylor v. Taylor, 267 S.C. 530, 229 S.E.2d 852 (1976); Moyle v. Moyle,......
-
Parrott v. Parrott, 21712
...interest favoring that party can be found. McKenzie, supra; Wilson, supra; Simmons v. Simmons, 275 S.C. 41, 267 S.E.2d 427; Baker v. Baker, S.C., 279 S.E.2d 601; Bugg v. Bugg, S.C., 286 S.E.2d 142; Burgess, The real property at issue in this case is the marital residence, title to which was......
-
Reid v. Reid
...here clearly established that the wife materially contributed through "personal services to the husband's business." Baker v. Baker, 276 S.C. 427, 430, 279 S.E.2d 601 (1981). She did so in a variety of ways. Among other things, she provided secretarial and bookkeeping services to the compan......
-
EALEY v. EALEY, 90-401
...recognized a broader range of homemaker activities as contributing to entitlement to an equitable interest. Baker v. Baker, 276 S.C. 427, 429-31, 279 S.E.2d 601, 602 (1981) (normal household duties and caring for non-homemaker spouse); Simmons v. Simmons, 275 S.C. 41, 43, 267 S.E.2d 427, 42......