Baker v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R.R. Co.
| Decision Date | 31 August 1874 |
| Citation | 57 Mo. 274 |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
| Parties | ISAAC B. BAKER, Respondent, v. CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND & PACIFIC RAILROAD CO., Appellant. |
1. See 57 Mo. 265.
Appeal from Clinton Circuit Court.
J. H. Shanklin & M. A. Low, for Appellant.
Porter & Turner and Thos. E. Turney, for Respondent.
This case was argued and submitted in connection with the case of Baker vs. The Chicago, R. I. & P. R. R. Co. which has been decided at this term; and for the reasons therein given, the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.
All the judges concur, except Judge Sherwood who is absent.
To continue reading
Request your trial
9 cases
-
Chicago, M. & St. P.R. Co. v. Randolph Town-Site Co.
...construction of the railroad, and the owner could not maintain ejectment against the plaintiff. Provolt v. Railroad, 57 Mo. 256; Baker v. Railroad, 57 Mo. 265; Hosher Railroad, 60 Mo. 329; Kanaga v. Railroad, 76 Mo. 207. (5) If the possession was obtained under any specific agreement, the o......
-
Lumerate v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company
... ... this. Hubert v. Railroad, 63 Mo. 71; Baker v ... Railroad, 57 Mo. 274. (3) Section 544, R ... ...
-
Dickson v. St. Louis & Kirkwood Railroad Company
...not have recovered the right of way in ejectment and can not sustain this action for a mere breach of a condition subsequent. Baker v. Railroad, 57 Mo. 274; Dodd Railroad, 108 Mo. 585; Jones v. Railroad, 79 Mo. 97. (3) There was no evidence to support the findings and judgment. 4 Kent's Com......
-
Johnson v. Ohio River R. Co.
...580, 26 N.E. 7; Railroad Co. v. Railroad Co., 98 Ala. 400, 13 So. 682, 39 Am.St.Rep. 74; Gray v. Railroad Co., 37 Iowa 119; Baker v. Railroad Co., 57 Mo. 274; v. Railroad Co., 14 Am. & Eng. Ry. Cas. 456. No decision of this court asserts the doctrine as between a private person and a railro......
Request a trial to view additional results