Baker v. Harpster
Decision Date | 05 October 1889 |
Parties | HENRY C. BAKER, as Receiver of the Elevator and Mill Company of Everest, v. E. J. HARPSTER et al |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Error from Brown District Court.
THIS action was brought by Henry C. Baker, receiver of the Elevator and Mill Company, of Everest, against the defendants. Trial at the January term, 1887, of the district court, and judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant the State Savings Bank of St. Joseph, Missouri, and Benjamin F. Harpster. To reverse this judgment the plaintiff brings the case here; and the defendants Benjamin F. and E. J Harpster file their cross-petition praying a reversal of the judgment. Trial by the court, which made special findings of fact, which, together with the pleadings and judgment, are brought here. The pleadings and findings of fact present substantially the following facts: That in March, 1882, the Farmers' Elevator and Mill Company was incorporated, with an authorized capital stock of $ 15,000. This company was composed of all of the defendants save the State Savings Bank, and included some others. Afterward the capital stock of the company was increased to $ 20,000. B. F. Harpster was its president and chief managing officer; W. H. H. Curtis was secretary, and J. F. Harpster was treasurer. B. F. Harpster was also the owner of a bank at Severance, Kansas, and J. F Harpster was his chief clerk, and kept the treasurer's books of the corporation. In the course of the business of the corporation an arrangement was made between the officers of the corporation and its president, by which he was to advance from his bank sums of money from time to time to carry on the business of the corporation. This agreement was made and spread upon the minutes by action of the board of directors, and was agreed to and accepted by the president B. F. Harpster. This contract was as follows:
FRED HARPSTER, Vice-President.
W. H. H. CURTIS, Secretary.
"I hereby agree to advance money and make loans to the Farmers' Elevator and Mill Company on the foregoing terms and conditions.
October 3, 1882.
Under this agreement B. F. Harpster advanced to the company and for it, over and above all receipts from the company and payments thereon, $ 57,974.32. This arrangement was known to nearly all the stockholders, and was within the knowledge or means of knowledge of all of them. This was the condition of the company on the 5th day of January, 1884, at which time it sought to buy an additional mill and elevator at Everest Kansas. Desiring to take in one Henry Fluke as a stockholder, it was found that in order to do so the capital stock would have to be increased, and to do this, by mutual agreement of all parties, a new company was organized, called the Elevator and Mill Company, of Everest, Kansas, with a capital stock of $ 80,000, with the understanding that such new corporation was the continuation of the old Farmers' Elevator and Mill Company. The officers of the old company were elected officers of the new, and the property of the old company, consisting of an elevator and mill at Severance, in Doniphan county, and two elevators in Brown county, and one mill at Willis, and one at Everest, with grain and feed and other personal property of the value of thirty-five or forty...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Barrie v. United Rys. Co. of St. Louis
...72 Iowa, 666, 34 N. W. 467, 2 Am. St. Rep. 263; Benesh v. Mill Owners' Mutual Fire Ins. Co., 103 Iowa, 465, 72 N. W. 674; Baker v. Harpster, 42 Kan. 511, 22 Pac. 415; Fernschild v. Vedder, 154 N. Y. 667, 49 N. E. 151; Alexander v. Williams, 14 Mo. App. 13; Powell v. Railroad, 42 Mo. 63; Bur......
-
Barrie v. United Railways Co. of St. Louis
...v. Canning Co., 72 Iowa 666, 34 N.W. 467; Benesh v. Mill Owners Mutual Fire Ins. Co., 103 Iowa 465, 72 N.W. 674; Baker v. Harpster, 42 Kan. 511, 22 P. 415; Fernschild v. Vedder, 154 N.Y. 667, 49 N.E. 151; Alexander v. Williams, 14 Mo.App. 13; Powell v. [138 Mo.App. 668] Railroad, 42 Mo. 63;......
-
Barrie v. United Railways Company of St. Louis
... ... assumed largely exceed the assets. Benesh v. Insurance ... Co., 103 Iowa 465; Baker v. Harpster, 42 Kan ... 511; Fernschild v. Brewing Co., 154 N.Y. 667 ... BLAND, ... P. J. Goode, J., concurs in reversing the ... ...
- Coulson v. Wing