Baker v. Marcum, Sr.

Decision Date22 October 1926
Citation216 Ky. 210
PartiesBaker v. Marcum, Sr.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky

Appeal from Clay Circuit Court.

MURRAY L. BROWN, MORRIS & JONES and MARTIN T. KELLY, for appellant.

ROY W. HOUSE and WILLIAM LEWIS & SON for appellee.

OPINION OF THE COURT BY TURNER, COMMISSIONER.

Affirming.

Appellee was nominated in the August primary, 1925, as the Republican candidate for jailer of Clay county. Shortly thereafter he received his certificate of nomination, but did not file the same forty-five days before the regular election as is required by law.

Appellant as an independent candidate filed her petition with the county court clerk with the required number of electors signing same, and filed it more than forty-five days before the regular election.

Although the failure of appellee to file his certificate of nomination in the time required by law created a vacancy in that nomination (Lewis v. Mosely, 215 Ky. 573) no effective steps were taken by the party committee under the provisions of section 1550-5 to fill that vacancy until after the ballots for the regular election had been printed with appellee's name wrongfully printed thereon because of his failure to file his certificate in time. Then after the printing of the ballots with appellee's name so wrongfully printed thereon as the Republican nominee the chairman of the Republican county committee recognizing the existence of a vacancy in such nomination, and acting under authority of section 1464, Ky. Stats., certified to the county court clerk the name of appellee as the nominee of the party to fill such vacancy, and designated him as such nominee; and also undertook in that certificate to provide for the use of pasters by the election officers at the regular election. This was on the 31st day of October, 1925, only a few days before the regular election and at a time when the ballots for that election had already been printed.

At the election no pasters were in fact used, but as appellee's name had before the filing of that certificate with the county clerk already been wrongfully printed upon the official ballots, the electors instead of using the pasters or going through the useless form of pasting over his name already on the ballot a paster containing the same name, voted for him either...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT