Baker v. McLeod's Estate
Decision Date | 05 May 1891 |
Citation | 79 Wis. 534,48 N.W. 657 |
Parties | BAKER v. MCLEOD'S ESTATE. |
Court | Wisconsin Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from circuit court, Brown county; SAMUEL D. HASTINGS, Judge.
It appears from the record that February 6, 1871, Alexander McLeod died at the village of West De Pere, in Brown county, testate, leaving a will executed January 30, 1871, and which was admitted to probate March 6, 1871; that said Alexander McLeod, in and by said will, gave, bequeathed, and devised all of his estate, both real and personal, to M. De Witt Peak, of Green Bay, as executor thereby appointed, and to his executor or executors, or such other trustee or trustees as might otherwise be lawfully appointed, in trust to pay debts and expenses, and execute said will, in the manner therein stated, and with power of sale and reinvestment; that it was therein ordered and directed, in effect, that, as soon as “the reasonable necessities” of his child therein named would permit, and within one year after the death of said testator, there should be paid to Miss Sarah Ritchie, who since the death of his wife had had the principal care of his said child, the sum of $500; that said will contained the following provisions, to-wit: was, in effect, therein provided to be paid to the trustees of the First Presbyterian Society of Green Bay, in trust, nevertheless, for the purposes therein mentioned; that any residue of his said estate should, in the event stated, be retained by said executor, executors, or trustees, to his or their own use, in addition to all such compensation as should be allowed by law; that said will also contained the following provisions: that said deceased left him surviving a daughter, Annie May McLeod, who married one W. A. Leddy, and on May 14, 1888, gave birth to a child, the said George McLeod Leddy; that June 27, 1888, the said Annie McLeod died, under the age of 21 years; that April 10, 1889, the county court for Brown county rendered judgment in said matter, by which it was adjudged that the residue of the estate of said Alexander McLeod be assigned as follows: To Miss Sarah Ritchie, $1,253.81; to the First Presbyterian Society of Green Bay, in trust for the purposes named in the will, $5,015.28; that June 8, 1889, the said plaintiff, as such administrator and guardian, appealed from that judgment to the circuit court for Brown county; that at the close of the trial of said appeal in the circuit court, and on March 17, 1890, the circuit court found, as matters of fact, in addition to the facts stated, that the bequest in said will to said Sarah Ritchie of $2,000, and to the First Presbyterian Society of Green Bay of $8,000, were general bequests, and must abate proportionately, as the moneys in the hands of the administrator were insufficient to pay them in full; that said society was duly organized according to law, and had a duly-organized Sundayschool and library; and, as questions of law, that the will was valid; that the bequests to Sarah Ritchie and to the First Presbyterian Society of Green Bay were valid, lawful bequests, and that the proper disposition of the estate in the hands of the administrator was made by the county court, and that the judgment of that court should be affirmed; that judgment was thereupon entered accordingly, affirming the judgment of the county court, and remitting the same to that court for further proceedings. From that judgment, and the whole thereof, the plaintiff as such administrator and guardian, brings this appeal.Wigman & Martin, for appellant.
Vroman & Sale, for respondent.
CASSODAY, J., ( after stating the facts as above.)
The testator's wife died before he did. At the time of his death he was about 26 years of age. Annie May was his only child, and at the time of his death she must have been less than four years of age. He executed his will only a week before he died, and apparently with the expectation of death's near approach. His anxiety for his little girl must, under the circumstances, have been very great. His tender regard for her is manifest in the will. He left $500 to Miss Ritchie, who had the principal care of her after his wife's death. He committed the tuition, nurture, and custody of the person of Annie to Miss Ritchie, who for those purposes was thereby appointed her guardian for such time as she should continue unmarried and under the age of 21 years. He provided that in case Miss Ritchie died before the expiration of that period, then that her tuition, nurture, and custody should be committed, for the remainder of said term, to his executor named. He necessarily put his estate into the hands of a trustee, with power of sale and reinvestment to manage and control, until Annie should, in the eyes of the law, become capable of taking charge of it. He expressly provided that, after the payment of his debts, expenses, and the legacy mentioned, his trustee, named, or his successor, should, until Annie attained the full age of 21 years, “remain in the possession of all the residue and remainder” of his estate, and the proceeds, and “all the rents, profits, and income thereof,” and should “from time to time pay and apply the whole of such rents, profits, and income, or such part thereof, or such part of the whole estate,” as he or they should deem for the advantage of his child, for and towards the maintenance...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hull v. Rolfsrud
...in the property of the trust which passes to his heirs by descent. Williams v. Williams, 135 Wis. 60, 115 N.W. 342; Baker v. McLeod's Estate, 79 Wis. 534, 48 N.W. 657. An equitable estate in the cestui que trust has been recognized in spite of the code section identical with ours in the fol......
-
Bernero v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.
...Lynch v. Hill, 6 Munf. 114; Ball v. Phelan, 94 Miss. 293; In re Donges Estate, 103 Wis. 497; Cleland v. Waters, 16 Ga. 496; Baker v. Estate of McLeod, 79 Wis. 534. (2) construction of the will of Louis Bernero contended for in appellant's first point is required, because the provision of Cl......
-
Patton v. Ludington
...or title in the trustees for the purposes of the trust, and vesting the equitable estate in the cestui que trust. Baker v. McLeod's Estate, 79 Wis. 540, 541, 48 N. W. 657, and cases there cited. In some of the cases cited above, and in several hereinafter cited, it was held that the power o......
-
Williams v. Williams
...v. Roberts, 84 Wis. 465, 54 N. W. 917;Baker et al. v. Baker, etc., 57 Wis. 382, 15 N. W. 425; section 2206, St. 1898; Baker v. Estate of McLeod, 79 Wis. 534, 48 N. W. 657; sections 2289, 2278, St. 1898; Hall v. Hall et al., 98 Wis. 193, 73 N. W. 1000; In Matter of Prosper A. Pierce, 56 Wis.......