Baker v. Smallwood

Decision Date06 February 1912
PartiesBAKER v. SMALLWOOD et al.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Appeal from Circuit court, Jackson County; O. A. Lucas, Judge.

Action by W. C. Baker against W. H. Smallwood and John C. Kroge. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant Kroge appeals. Reversed and remanded.

M. J. Kilroy, for appellant. Wilcox & Kennedy, for respondent.

JOHNSON, J.

This suit is to enforce a mechanic's lien, filed by a subcontractor, who agreed with the original contractor to do the painting of a residence under construction, according to the plans and specifications, for the lump sum of $180. Judgment was recovered by plaintiff for the full amount of his demand, and a lien was adjudged. The appeal was taken by the owner of the property.

The request of the appealing defendant for an instruction in the nature of a demurrer to the evidence should have been sustained for two reasons: First. No evidence was offered by plaintiff to prove that the indebtedness for which he claimed a lien accrued within four months next preceding the filing of the lien. The statute provides (section 8217, R. S. 1909) that "it shall be the duty of every original contractor within six months, and every journeyman and day laborer within sixty days, and every other person seeking to obtain the benefit of the provisions of this article within four months, after the indebtedness shall have accrued, to file with the clerk of the circuit court of the proper county a just and true account of the demand due him or them after all just credits have been given," etc.

The affidavit to the lien account is not evidence of the date of its accrual; and to entitle a subcontractor to a lien it is just as essential that he introduce proof that his lien was filed within four months of the accrual of the account, as it is to prove that he furnished the material, and that it went into the building. Darlington v. Tozer, 88 Mo. App. 525.

Second. The account filed, so far as it relates to the work done by plaintiff under his original contract...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Becker v. Hopper
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • January 27, 1914
    ... ... v. Orphan School, 63 Mo.App. 28; Dwyer Brick Works ... v. Flanagan, 87 Mo.App. 340; Feeny v. Rothbaum, (Mo ... App.) 137 S.W. 82; Baker v. Smallwood, (Mo ... App.) 143 S.W. 518; Wharton v. Real Est. Co., ... (Pa.) 36 A. 725). The provisions of Chapter 68, Laws ... 1911, having ... ...
  • Kurtz v. Field et al.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • February 5, 1929
    ...not prove itself, even though recorded. Darlington v. Eldridge, 88 Mo. App. 525; Jose v. Hoyt, 106 Mo. App. 594, 596; Baker v. Smallwood, 161 Mo. App. 257, 143 S.W. 518; Marshall v. Hall, 200 S.W. 770; House Wrecking, etc., Co. v. Gartrell, 204 S.W. 52. (4) Defendant Field may avail himself......
  • Springfield Planing Mill, Lumber & Const. Co. v. Krebs
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • March 24, 1917
    ...prima facie the reasonable value of the articles. Hilliker v. Francisco (1877) 65 Mo. 598." In the recent case of Baker v. Smallwood, 161 Mo. App. 257, 259, 143 S. W. 518, 519, the court, speaking of an account where, as here, both the materials furnished and the price charged were lumped (......
  • Vasquez v. Village Center, Inc., 49448
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • December 11, 1962
    ...*.' It is essential to show the timely filing of the lien account in order to establish the right to a mechanic's lien. Baker v. Smallwood, 161 Mo.App. 257, 143 S.W. 518; Wilson v. Berning, Mo.App., 293 S.W.2d 151, It follows, therefore, that the timely filing of the lien account was an ess......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT