Baker v. State
Decision Date | 31 October 2003 |
Citation | 885 So.2d 241 |
Parties | Donald Earl BAKER v. STATE of Alabama. |
Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
Donald Earl Baker, pro se.
William H. Pryor, Jr., atty. gen., and Cecil G. Brendle, Jr., asst. atty. gen., for appellee.
In May 14, 2003, Donald Earl Baker filed his fourth Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P., petition in this case, along with an in forma pauperis declaration. After the State had responded, the circuit court summarily denied the petition on June 7, 2003. This appeal followed.
As the State and Baker point out, the record does not indicate either that the circuit court granted Baker's motion to proceed in forma pauperis or that it assessed a filing fee against him. We have recently addressed a similar situation:
Jackson v. State, 854 So.2d 157, 159 (Ala.Crim.App.2002) (footnotes omitted).
Thus, on the authority of Jackson, we remand this cause to the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hyde v. State
...pauperis, but that the petition "stands as filed in the circuit court" the date it was originally submitted); and Baker v. State, 885 So.2d 241, 244 (Ala.Crim.App.2003) (same). Accordingly, to the extent that Clemons holds that a Rule 32 petition is not deemed "filed" until the date the cir......
-
McCartha v. State
...(Ala.2000) ; Smith v. State, 918 So.2d 141 (Ala.Crim.App.2005) ; Madden v. State, 885 So.2d 841 (Ala.Crim.App.2003) ; Baker v. State, 885 So.2d 241 (Ala.Crim.App.2003). Thus, I agree whole-heartedly that "[s]ection 12–19–70, Ala.Code 1975, applies to Rule 32 petitions." Clemons v. State, 55......
-
Beamon v. State
...pauperis, but that the petition ‘stands as filed in the circuit court’ the date it was originally submitted); and Baker v. State, 885 So.2d 241, 244 (Ala.Crim.App.2003) (same). Accordingly, to the extent that Clemons [v. State, 55 So.3d 314 (Ala.Crim.App.2003) (opinion on return to remand) ......