Baker v. State, 67--451
Decision Date | 28 May 1968 |
Docket Number | No. 67--451,67--451 |
Citation | 211 So.2d 59 |
Parties | Roy Lee BAKER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender, and Herbert M. Klein, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Arthur L. Rothenberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.
The only point preserved for review on this appeal is the question of the 'voluntariness' of a statement given by the appellant.
From the record, it appears that counsel for the appellant (defendant in the trial court) conceded that the statement was given voluntarily. Therefore, we find the point not to be well taken on this appeal. Compare: Morgan v. State, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 60; State v. Jones, Fla.1967, 204 So.2d 515; Colebrook v. State, Fla.App.1968, 205 So.2d 675; Grace v. State, Fla.App.1968, 206 So.2d 225; Harris v. State, Fla.App.1968, 208 So.2d 108; DeRiggi v. State, Fla.App.1968, 209 So.2d 714 (opinion filed April 30, 1968).
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Escobedo v. State
...verdict. See McCook v. Caruthers, 87 Fla. 238, 99 So. 559 (1924); Saxon v. Chacon, 539 So.2d 11 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Baker v. State, 211 So.2d 59 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968); 3 Fla.Jur.2d Appellate Review § 292 (1978) ("A party to an appeal may lose his right to attack error by agreeing or consenting......
-
Britt v. State, 67-987
...Mendelow, Asst.Atty.Gen., for appellee. Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed on the authority of Baker v. State, Fla.App.1968, 211 So.2d 59 (opinion filed this ...