Ball v. Inland Mutual Insurance Company, 30794
| Decision Date | 22 March 1961 |
| Docket Number | No. 30794,30794 |
| Citation | 128 So.2d 130 |
| Parties | Fred S. BALL, Petitioner, v. INLAND MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Huntington, West Virginia, Respondent. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Writ of Certiorari to the District Court of Appeal, Third District, 121 So.2d 470.
Headley & Sudduth, Miami, for petitioner.
Gotthardt, Christie & Shepard, Miami, for respondent.
The petition for writ of certiorari reflects apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the petition is without merit, therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
1 cases
-
Kobetitsch v. American Mfrs.' Mut. Ins. Co., 80-275
...cites the Chase & Co. case), this court held in Ball v. Inland Mutual Ins. Co., 121 So.2d 470 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960), cert. discharged, 128 So.2d 130 (Fla.1961), that an original entrustment which would impose tort liability on the employer, does not-as a matter either of public policy or of th......