Ball v. Sledge
| Decision Date | 23 November 1903 |
| Citation | 82 Miss. 747,35 So. 214 |
| Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
| Parties | WILLIAM BALL ET AL. v. EDWARD SLEDGE |
October, 1903
FROM the circuit court of Bolivar county. HON. A. McC. KIMBROUGH, Judge.
Ball and another, appellants, were plaintiffs, and Sledge, appellee was defendant in the court below. The case was begun in a justice's court. From a judgment in defendant's favor the plaintiffs appealed to the supreme court. The state of the record, on which the case turned, is shown by the opinion of the court.
Appeal dismissed.
Moore & Clark, for appellants.
Sillers & Owen, for appellee.
This is a suit instituted by appellants in a justice of the peace court, and, so far as this record shows, the case was never tried or decided by the justice of the peace. There is no judgment of the justice of the peace, no bond for appeal to the circuit court, nothing to show a final determination in the court where the case was first tried. Sections 83 and 84 of the Code of 1892 state whet is necessary to be done in causes originating before a justice of the peace and appealed to the circuit court. Under the facts disclosed by this record, the circuit court had no jurisdiction, and therefore this court has none, and we are forced to dismiss the appeal. Appellants may, if they can, perfect their appeal by certiorari, whereupon we will reinstate the case, conditioned that the appellants shall pay the costs of the appeal in this court. See Gardner v. R. R. Co., 78 Miss. 640, 29 So. 469, and cases there cited.
Appeal dismissed, but with privilege of reinstatement on terms indicated. [*]
---------
Notes:
[*]The case was reinstated and afterwards decided on its merits. See next casein these reports.
---------
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Waits v. Black Bayou Drainage Dist
...712, 106 So. 280; Rodgers v. City of Hattiesburg, 99 Miss. 639, 55 So. 481; Ruff v. Montgomery, 83 Miss. 184, 35 So. 465; Ball v. Sledge, 82 Miss. 747, 35 So. 214; Gardner v. R. R. Co., 78 Miss. 640, 29 So. McPhail v. Blaun, 95 Miss. 53, 48 So. 725; City of Greenwood v. Weaver, 96 Miss. 604......
-
Bickham v. Department of Mental Health
...So. 168 (1932); Welch v. Bryant, 157 Miss. 559, 128 So. 734 (1930); Johnson v. Marshall, 48 So. 182 (Miss.1909); Ball, Brown & Co. v. Sledge, 82 Miss. 747, 35 So. 214 (1903). This Court erred in Sonford Products Corp. v. Freels, 495 So.2d 468, 471 (Miss.1986), in which we held that a circui......
-
State ex rel. Robbins v. Southern Natural Gas Corporation
...19 So. 583; Dougherty v. Canton, 11 Miss. (3 S. & M.) 100; 3 C. J. 632; Ruff v. Montgomery, 83 Miss. 185, 190, 36 So. 67; Ball v. Sledge, 82 Miss. 747, 35 So. 214; Humphreys v. MacFarland, 48 So. 182; Land v. 171 Miss. 91, 157 So. 89. The state having received all to which it is entitled is......
-
Jones v. State
... ... render the judgment appealed from, that have been called to ... our attention, are Gardner v. R. R. Co., 78 Miss ... 640, 29 So. 469; Ball v. Sledge, 82 Miss. 747, 35 ... So. 214; Ruff v. Montgomery, 83 Miss. 184, 35 So ... 465; Rayborn v. Cothern (Miss.), 43 So. 70; ... McPhail v ... ...