Ballard v. Hopkins, 2716

Citation142 So.2d 738
Decision Date20 June 1962
Docket NumberNo. 2716,2716
PartiesEllis W. BALLARD et ux., Appellants, v. Wilson W. HOPKINS, Jr., Appellee.
CourtCourt of Appeal of Florida (US)

A. Bradford Smith; Boone, Smith, hazen & Isphording, Venice, for appellants.

Grimes, Grimes & Goebel, Bradenton, for appellee.

SMITH, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the trial judge directing the jury to return a verdict in favor of the defendant in a negligence action.

Although the parties to this appeal have not raised the question, an examination of the record discloses a question of this Court's jurisdiction. The notice of appeal filed in this cause on July 31, 1961, was as follows:

'* * * [T]o review the final judgment in favor of the defendant, Wilson W. Hopkins, Jr., rendered by the Circuit Court for Sarasota County, Florida, bearing date the 1st day of June, 1961, entered in the above styled cause and filed and recorded on the 1st day of June, 1961, * * *.'

Despite the above-quoted language of the notice of appeal, the record discloses that the only thing entered in this cause on June 1, 1961, was the jury verdict. However, there was filed in this Court, on January 26, 1962, a 'certified copy of Judgment,' which is entitled 'Final Judgment' and entered on January 12, 1962, 'nunc pro tunc.' 'Final Judgment' was 'filed and recorded' in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court on January 12, 1962.

Florida Appellate Rule 3,2(b), 31 F.S.A., Commencement of Proceedings, reads as follows:

'b. Time. Appeals from final decisions, orders, judgments or decrees shall be commenced within 60 days from the rendition of the final decision, order, judgment or decree appealed from, unless some other period of time for taking an appeal is specifically provided by statute or these rules.' (Emphasis supplied)

Florida Appellate Rule 1.3, Definitions, defines 'Rendition' as follows:

"Rendition' of a judgment, decision, order or decree means that it has been reduced to writing, signed and made a matter of record, or if recording is not required then filed. A paper is deemed to be recorded when filed with the clerk and assigned a book and page number. * * *'

In the instant case, this appeal was taken from the jury verdict, which is not a final judgment, and thus will not support an appeal. Although this particular situation has not been before the courts of this state, similar situations have arisen. An order granting a motion to dismiss and motion to strike complaint in a negligence action was not a final judgment from which an appeal could be taken. Baker v. Colley, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 473; Weinmann v. Ligon, Fla.App.1958, 105 So.2d 204. An order granting defendant's motion for directed verdict is not a final judgment from which an appeal would lie. Schutzer v. City of Miami, Fla.App.1958, 99 So.2d 729. An order granting a motion for summary judgment is not a final judgment from which an appeal may be taken. Chastain v. Embry, Fla.App.1960, 118 So.2d 33; ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Turlay v. Farmers Ins. Exchange
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • September 10, 1971
    ...1 Freeman, Judgments 264, § 139 (5th ed. 1925).See also United States v. Rayburn, 91 F.2d 162, 164 (8th Cir. 1937).2 See Ballard v. Hopkins, 142 So.2d 738 (Fla.App.1962); Hampshire Arms Hotel Co. v. Wells, 210 Minn. 286, 298 N.W. 452 (1941); Martin v. Smith, 11 S.D. 437, 78 N.W. 1001 (1899)......
  • Dauer v. Freed
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • January 17, 1984
    ...necessarily implicit in the very denial of the motions. Thus, since an adverse jury verdict is itself not appealable, Ballard v. Hopkins, 142 So.2d 738 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962), the right to appeal an order the effect of which is to leave the verdict undisturbed must await the entry of a final ju......
  • Metropolitan Dade County v. Green
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • April 9, 1992
    ...is quashed and Dauer is disapproved to the extent it conflicts with the views expressed above. We also disapprove Ballard v. Hopkins, 142 So.2d 738 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962), to the extent it may be construed as inconsistent with the views It is so ordered. SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, BARKE......
  • Metropolitan Dade County v. Green, 90-2536
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • May 7, 1991
    ...444 So.2d 1012 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984) rests on the premise that an adverse jury verdict is itself not appealable. See Ballard v. Hopkins, 142 So.2d 738 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962). Nonetheless, defendant argues that such a verdict does determine the issue of liability pursuant to Florida Rule of Appella......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT