Ballentine v. State

Decision Date23 October 1939
Docket Number4140
Citation132 S.W.2d 384,198 Ark. 1037
PartiesBALLENTINE v. STATE
CourtArkansas Supreme Court

Appeal from Sebastian Circuit Court, Fort Smith District; J. Sam Wood, Judge; affirmed.

Affirmed.

H. C Rains, for appellant.

Jack Holt, Attorney General, and Jno P. Streepey, Asst. Atty General, for appellee.

OPINION

MCHANEY, J.

Appellant was indicted for the crime of murder in the first degree for the killing on the 25th day of May, 1939, of Albert Honea. On a trial he was convicted of murder in the second degree, and punishment fixed at twenty-one years in the state penitentiary, on which judgment was entered, from which is this appeal.

The only contention made for a reversal of the judgment is that the court erred in giving an instruction on murder in the second degree for the reason, as contended by him, that the evidence clearly shows that he was guilty of no greater offense than voluntary manslaughter. For this reason he asks that the judgment be reversed and the punishment reduced to the maximum amount fixed by law for manslaughter. His contention is that the record fails to disclose any malice on his part or any intention to kill Honea.

Murder in the first degree is defined by statute, § 2969, Pope's Digest, as "all murder which shall be perpetrated by means of poison, or by lying in wait, or by any other kind of wilful, deliberate, malicious and premeditated killing, or shall be committed in the perpetration of or in the attempt to perpetrate," certain crimes named. The statute then says, § 2970, Pope's Digest: "All other murder shall be deemed murder in the second degree." We have many times held that actual intent to take life is not a necessary element of the crime of murder in the second degree. Brassfield v. State, 55 Ark. 556, 18 S.W. 1040; Byrd v. State, 76 Ark. 286, 88 S.W. 974. Malice, however, is a necessary element of murder, either in the first or second degree, and it must be either express or implied. Section 2967 provides: "Malice shall be implied when no considerable provocation appears, or when all the circumstances of the killing manifest an abandoned and wicked disposition."

Albert Honea was an old man and operated some kind of a "joint" near the foot of the Frisco bridge across the Arkansas River in Fort Smith. Appellant and others had gathered at his place and had engaged in a penny ante poker game and in shooting dice, and the evidence tends to show that they had all become more or less intoxicated from drinking bay rum. One of the witnesses testified that appellant got mad over the crap game and "seemed to take his spite out" on deceased who was not in the crap game and had taken no part in the gambling. The evidence shows that appellant attacked Honea with his fists,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • Cooper v. Campbell, 78-1534
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • April 25, 1979
    ...an essential element of both first and second degree murder. McGaha v. State, 216 Ark. 165, 224 S.W.2d 534 (1949); Ballentine v. State, 198 Ark. 1037, 132 S.W.2d 384 (1939). Manslaughter was defined generally as the unlawful killing of a human being without malice express or implied and wit......
  • Williams v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • June 7, 1971
    ...to manslaughter a homicide which would otherwise be murder.' Bishop's New Criminal Law, p. 296, § 401. See, also, Ballentine v. State, 198 Ark. 1037, 132 S.W.2d 384, and other cases cited in West's Arkansas Digest, Homicide Furthermore, the verdict of guilty of murder in the second degree s......
  • Ezell v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • April 10, 1950
    ...intent to kill. A specific intent to kill is not necessary to constitute the crime of murder in the second degree. Ballentine v. State, 198 Ark. 1037, 132 S.W.2d 384. The matters contained in other instructions requested by appellant were fully covered in those given and the court is not re......
  • McGaha v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • November 28, 1949
    ... ... a public highway and deal him a deadly blow with his fist in ... a vital part, and when death, the natural consequence of his ... act, ensues, be heard to say that he merely intended to ... punish him, and not to kill him." [216 Ark. 169] ...           In ... Ballentine v. State, 198 Ark. 1037, 132 ... S.W.2d 384, also cited by appellant, the defendant knocked ... deceased down with his fists and then kicked and stamped him ... to death. A conviction for murder in the second degree was ... sustained and it was held that the evidence was sufficient to ... have ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT