Ballinger v. Connable
Decision Date | 10 December 1896 |
Citation | 69 N.W. 438,100 Iowa 121 |
Parties | BALLINGER ET AL. v. CONNABLE. |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from district court, Lee county; A. J. McCrary, Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of the district court approving and confirming a report made by the plaintiffs as executors of the last will and testament of A. L. Connable, deceased. The order of the court was excepted to by Edwin H. Connable, one of the devisees named in the will, and he appeals. Affirmed.James H. Anderson, for appellant.
James C. Davis, for appellees.
1. Albert L. Connable, the testator, died in the month of April, 1894. He left three sons surviving him, named Albert E. Connable, Howard L. Connable, and the appellant, E. H. Connable. On the 31st day of December, 1887, he executed his will, by which he bequeathed all of his property to his said sons; each one to have one-third of his estate after taking an account of certain advancements made by him to them. That part of the will necessary to be considered in determining this appeal is as follows: It is further provided in the will that the division of the property shall be made “with as little trouble as possible.” And, as showing the confidence reposed in the executors by the testator, a codicil to the will is in these words: “I further will and direct that should my estate be put to any expense by any of the beneficiaries under this will contesting this will, that the amount of such expense, including attorney's fees which are rendered necessary to be paid by my executors in defending against such contests or suits, and that any expense which may be made to the estate in contesting any decision of my executors in making division of my estate, in their discretion, shall be chargeable alone to the share given by the foregoing will to such devisees or beneficiary, and to such extent the devise to such beneficiary is charged hereby.” A second codicil to the will is as follows: The will was duly admitted to probate, and Ballinger and Mathias, who were named therein as executors, proceeded to settle and distribute the estate as directed by the will. They took an account of the advancements, and made a division of part of the property, and filed their report of the division made. This report is too voluminous to incorporate in an opinion. It is sufficient to state generally that, in making a division of the estate, the son named Albert E. Connable was found to have had advancements amounting to several thousand dollars, and he had received conveyances of land, including what was denominated as his “Home Farm,” of 268 acres, in Hancock county, Ill. This farm was appraised by the executors at the sum of $17,500. Some bank stock was also set apart to him, so that the total value of property set apart to him amounted to $28,656. The advancements and division made to Howard L. Connable amounted to $19,316. The following is a statement of the advancements made to Edwin H. Connable, the appellant herein:
To Edwin H. Connable.
+----------------------------------------------------------+ ¦By book account ¦$ 7,344 96¦ +-----------------------------------------------+----------¦ ¦By notes, Exhibits 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 ¦3,018 02 ¦ +-----------------------------------------------+----------¦ ¦By fifty shares Keokuk Savings Bank stock ¦7,500 00 ¦ +-----------------------------------------------+----------¦ ¦By E. hf. L. 6, B. 65, Keokuk, Iowa, Exhibit 15¦9,000 00 ¦...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Koch's Estate, In re
...for decedent or to any fact which tends to establish an express or implied contract between claimant and decedent. Ballinger v. Connable, 100 Iowa 121, 129, 130, 69 N.W. 438; In re Estate of Kahl, 210 Iowa 903, 911, 912 and cases cited, 232 N.W. 133.' This language has been repeated in John......