Baltimore & O.R. Co. v. Railroad Commission of Indiana
| Decision Date | 25 April 1912 |
| Docket Number | in Chancery.,11,019 |
| Citation | 196 F. 690 |
| Parties | BALTIMORE & O.R. CO. v. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF INDIANA. |
| Court | United States Circuit Court, District of Indiana |
[Copyrighted Material Omitted] [Copyrighted Material Omitted] [Copyrighted Material Omitted] [Copyrighted Material Omitted] [Copyrighted Material Omitted] [Copyrighted Material Omitted] [Copyrighted Material Omitted]
Calhoun, Lyford & Sheean, of Chicago, Ill., F. A. Durban, of Zanesville, Ohio, and Miller, Shirley & Miller, of Indianapolis, Ind., for complainant.
Smith, Duncan, Hornbrook & Smith and Roby & Watson, all of Indianapolis, Ind., for defendant.
Come now the parties by their respective solicitors, and thereupon the court, having heard the argument of counsel and duly considered the same, and being sufficiently advised in the premises, overrules all the exceptions to the report of the special master herein, and it is ordered that said report of the special master be, and the same is hereby, fully approved and confirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Dingman
...Ann. 646, 12 So. 739; Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Commonwealth, 99 Ky. 132, 59 Am. St. 457, 35 S.W. 129, 23 L. R. A. 209; Baltimore & O. Ry. v. Railway Com., 196 F. 690; Chicago I. & L. Ry. Co. v. Salem, 166 Ind. 71, N.E. 631; State v. International G. N. Ry. (Tex. Civ.), 165 S.W. 892; Gulf C......