Bamel v. Bulding Comm'r of Brookline
| Decision Date | 18 October 1924 |
| Citation | 145 N.E. 272,250 Mass. 82 |
| Parties | BAMEL v. BULDING COMMISSIONER OF BROOKLINE. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
M. B. Holsberg and Maurice B. Lynch, both of Boston, for petitioner.
R. A. Stewart and C. O. Pengra, both of Boston, for respondent.
This is a petition for a writ of certiorari to quash the action of the respondent, building commissioner of the town of Brookline, in revoking permits to the petitioner to build houses on lots owned by him. The salient facts in this case are similar in their legal aspects to those under consideration in Brett v. Building Commissioner of Brookline, 248 Mass. --, 145 N. E. 269, just decided. The differences are differences of detail and not of substance. The case at bar is governed by the same principles stated in the opinion in that case and requires the same result.
Petition dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
City of Aurora v. Burns
...Inspector of Milton, 250 Mass. 63, 145 N. E. 265;Brett v. Building Com'r of Brookline, 250 Mass. 73, 145 N. E. 269;Bamel v. Building Com'r, 250, Mass. 82, 145 N. E. 272;Lincoln Trust Co. v. Williams Building Corp., 229 N. Y. 313, 128 N. E. 209;In re Cherry, 201 App. Div. 856, 193 N. Y. S. 5......
- Howden v. Mayor & Aldermen of Savannah
-
Crall v. City of Leominster
...of Milton, 250 Mass. 63, 145 N.E. 265, Brett v. Building Commr. of Brookline, 250 Mass. 73, 145 N.E. 269, and Bamel v. Building Commr. of Brookline, 250 Mass. 82, 145 N.E. 272. In the first of those cases, we held, 250 Mass. at p. 62, 145 N.E. 262, that municipal by-laws and ordinances of t......
- Brett v. Bldg. Comm'r of Brookline