Bank of California, Nat. Ass'n v. Mortgage Co., Holland-America
Citation | 104 Wash. 196,175 P. 956 |
Decision Date | 19 November 1918 |
Docket Number | 14937. |
Court | Washington Supreme Court |
Parties | BANK OF CALIFORNIA, NATIONAL ASS'N, v. MORTGAGE CO., HOLLAND-AMERICA. |
Editor's Note: Modified by 179 P. 853.
Department 2.
Appeal from Superior Court, King County; Everett Smith, Judge.
Action by the Bank of California, National Association, against the Mortgage Company, Holland-America. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals. Affirmed.
Ernest B. Herald, of Seattle, for appellant.
Kerr & McCord, of Seattle, for respondent.
This cause of action originated out of a transaction between the appellant and McPherson Bros. Company. In 1915, McPherson Bros. Company negotiated with appellant for a building loan of $2,300 evidenced by three promissory notes, one for $1,300 and two for $500 each, dated November 5, 1915, and agreed that the first of the $500 notes was due November 1, 1916 and that the interest on all the notes was payable semiannually on the 1st days of May and November respectively. These notes were secured by a mortgage, and executed prior to the payment of the money by appellant to a broker alleged to have been representing McPherson Bros. Company. This broker retained the difference between $2,300 and $2,146.41 as commission. McPherson Bros. Company contended that it was not chargeable with a brokerage commission, and assumed the position that it had received but $2,146.41 from appellant, while appellant contended that it had paid the entire $2,300 to McPherson Bros. Company, or on its account, and that therefore the true amount of indebtedness was $2,300 as evidenced by the notes. When the first installment of interest became due, McPherson Bros. Company remitted only a sufficient amount to cover interest at the agreed rate on the principal sum of $2,146.41. A great deal of correspondence regarding the dispute had been had between appellant and McPherson Bros. Company prior to November 1, 1916, the date of the second installment of interest and the maturity of the first of the $500 notes.
The foregoing events had transpired unknows to the respondent, and on or about November 1, 1916, it received by mail the following letters:
Respondent prepared and addressed a letter to appellant, accompanied by a form of receipt to be signed and executed by appellant, which are as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial