Bank of Courtland v. Long Creek Drainage Dist. No. 3 of Panola County

Decision Date26 November 1923
Docket Number23691
Citation97 So. 881,133 Miss. 531
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
PartiesBANK OF COURTLAND v. LONG CREEK DRAINAGE DIST. NO. 3 OF PANOLA COUNTY

Division B

(Division B.) January 1, 1920

APPEAL AND ERROR. Judgment sustaining demurrer to declaration not a "final judgment."

A judgment of a circuit court sustaining a demurrer to a declaration, and granting the plaintiff an appeal to the supreme court, is not a final judgment from which an appeal may be taken to the supreme court, under section 8 Hemingway's Code (section 33, Code of 1906).

HON GREEK L. RICE, Judge.

APPEAL from circuit court of Panola county, HON. GREEK L. RICE Judge.

Suit by the Bank of Courtland against Long Creek Drainage District No. 3 of Panola county. From an order sustaining demurrer to declaration, and granting plaintiff an appeal to the supreme court, the plaintiff appeals. Appeal dismissed.

No briefs on question decided.

Appeal dismissed.

Jas. B. Boyles, for appellant.

Lomax B. Lamb, for appellee.

OPINION

SYKES, P. J.

The appellant bank sued the appellee drainage district for a sum of money alleged to be due the bank by the drainage district. It is unnecessary to state the averments of the declaration. There was a demurrer sustained to it, whereupon the following order was entered:

"This cause came on to be heard and considered on the demurrer to the declaration herein, and, the court having maturely considered the same, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that said demurrer be, and the same is hereby, sustained, to which action the plaintiff excepts and prays an appeal to the supreme court, which is hereby granted."

Section 8, Hemingway's Code (section 33, Code of 1906), provides that an appeal may be taken to the supreme court from any final judgment of a circuit court.

The question which confronts the court before it can consider the action of the circuit court in sustaining the demurrer is whether or not this is a final judgment of the circuit court from which an appeal may be prosecuted to this court. A final judgment of the circuit court is a judgment adjudicating the merits of the controversy. Gulf & S. I. R. Co. v Williams, 109 Miss. 549, 68 So. 776; Dunagin v. National Bank, 118 Miss. 809, 80 So. 276. This judgment of the court does not state that the plaintiff recover nothing from the defendant; neither does it acquit the defendant of liability and tax the costs against the...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT