Bank of Delaware v. Bank of Delaware
| Decision Date | 30 June 1928 |
| Citation | 301 A.2d 280 |
| Parties | BANK OF DELAWARE, Executor U/W of Margaret F. Overdeer, et al., Defendants-Below, Appellants, v. BANK OF DELAWARE, Trustee U/A |
| Court | Supreme Court of Delaware |
Upon appeal from the Court of Chancery in and for New Castle County.
Henry R. Horsey, of Morris, James, Hitchens & Williams, Dover, for Bank of Del., Executor U/W Margaret F. Overdeer.
Henry N. Herndon, Jr., of Morris, James, Hitchens & Williams, Wilmington, for Bank of Del., Trustee.
Gerald C. Foulk, of Walker, Miller & Wakefield, Wilmington, for Hamilton P. Fox, Administrator of Estate of Mildred A. Morris, and Bank of Del., Trustee U/W of Willis L. Overdeer.
Samuel R. Russell, of Wilson & Russell, Wilmington, for individual defendants.
This case involves a trust in which the settlor left a life estate to his daughter and the remainder to his 'next of kin' in the event his daughter should die without issue. The settlor predeceased his daughter, and the daughter died without issue. The basic issue in this case is whether, in construing the trust instrument, the settlor's next of kin should be determined at the time of settlor's death or at the time of the life tenant's death.
The Court of Chancery entered summary judgment in favor of the next of kin as determined at the date of the life tenant's death. Certain other parties appeal that decision.
The Opinion below is reported at 289 A.2d 639. We affirm that decision for the reasons stated therein.
We emphasize, however, that our decision is not to be taken as overruling the rule of construction that, absent a clear and unambiguous manifestation of contrary intent, next of kin will be determined at the time of death of the ancestor rather than at the time of the death of the life tenant. Bedyk v. Bank of Delaware, Del.Supr., 40 Del. 140, 176 A.2d 196 (1961); Doe d. Wright v. Gooden, Del.Super., 6 Houst. 397 (1881).
We affirm that rule. Nonetheless, we concur with the Court below's conclusion that the trust instrument, taken as a whole, manifests clearly and unambiguously, an intent on the part of the settlor to have his next of kin determined at the date of the life tenant's death. Hence, the rule is inapplicable.
For the reasons stated in its Opinion, the decision of the Court below is affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Wilmington Trust Co. v. Coyne
... ... of Delaware, Trustee under an Agreement with ... William Coyne, Petitioner, ... Bank of Delaware v. Delaware Trust Company. In addition, when the rule against ... ...
-
Fiduciary Trust Co. of New York v. Fiduciary Trust Co. of New York
...at the time of death of the [Testator] rather than at the time of death of the life tenant. [citing] Bank of Delaware v. Bank of Delaware, Del.Supr., 301 A.2d 280 (1973); Delaware Trust Co. v. Delaware Trust Co., Del.Ch., 91 A.2d 44 (1952)." Finding no such clear manifestation of a contrary......
-
Riggs Nat. Bank of Washington, D.C. v. Zimmer
... ... Saulsbury, Petitioners, ... Ruth Anna ZIMMER et al., Respondents ... Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle County ... March 22, 1973 ... Rodney M. Layton, and Richard G. Elliott, Jr., Richards, Layton & Finger, Wilmington, and ... ...
-
Estate of Caney, Matter of
...absence of a "clear manifestation of intent to the contrary." Fiduciary Trust Co. N.Y., 445 A.2d at 931; Bank of Delaware v. Bank of Delaware, Del.Supr., 301 A.2d 280, 281 (1973). However, it is also well settled that a court will determine the decedent's next of kin after the death of a li......